Please read this article: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/dec/09120903.html

Mr. Mason, quite frankly I have concluded that you are either highly naive or simply do not care about the health and safety of youth.

Allow me to explore some of your comments:

•  "The Senate health care plan is going to teach kids about sex. Graphically, and early. With heaps of tax dollars."

First off there is nothing wrong with teaching kids about sex, being safe, and being abstinent which is also included in the curriculum.

Graphically, well there may be images of genitalia, but keep in mind you are referring to a course regarding sex.... As for "Early," Obama does not want to teach Kindergarteners how to put on a condom, but teach age appropriate information.

The curriculum will not be free, but the cost goes to saving lives, preventing STIs/STDs and preventing teenage pregnancy-- all of which are very costly. So by spending the money on an effective education, we will save money in the long run
 

• "What 'age-appropriate information' can the bill possibly have in mind for an 11-year-old boy" 

• "what good is "abstinence education" if contraception and abortion are being pushed right alongside it"

• "America has some of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the Western world precisely because of the graphic, value-free sex education that children are constantly exposed to."

• "The days of Woodstock and free love are long gone, and no amount of public funding or legislative mandates will bring them back."