Four years ago, a novel about a sparkly vampire and the girl who loves him took the world by storm.
It has been hailed as an achievement for feminism, a step forward, a new page in the fight. A female writer, a female protagonist, a female director for the eventual movie deal. This is what would make it click for young girls seeking a purpose and a fight.
The book, of course, was the first in the Twilight Saga.
When I tell people that I’m an English Lit major, most of them automatically say, “Ooo, have you read Twilight?”
Because I’m a nineteen-year-old girl, and all nineteen-year-old girls like the same things, 100% of the people who ask are not just shocked, but completely perplexed when I politely respond, “Yes, I read it. And I hated it.”
Usually, when a “WHY?!” is demanded after that exchange, I simply say I prefer wizards to vampires, but the truth is much more complicated. Twilight, and the acclaimed author,
Stephanie Meyer, are not exactly what they appear to be.
There are some things I don’t like about the Twilight Saga because I’m an English major (purple prose, dragging plot, clichéd dialogue). But I’ve found seven very good reasons why every feminist should not just hate Twilight, but run from it like the Ann Coulter of literature.
Reason 1- Bella is adored by everyone, especially her father, for whom she cooks and cleans for while he cleans his gun and drinks a beer.
Bella is hardly a realistic heroine. She’s not flawed, unless you count clumsiness, and everyone adores her, despite her rather obnoxious perfection.
To many people- and by “people”, I mean “men”- Bella is ideal. She’s polite, kind, quiet, cooks, and cleans. She’s like a beautiful 1950s housewife-robot without all those icky character flaws and unnecessary conversations!
Let’s look at these stereotypes, too. Bella cooks, she cleans. Her father is a terrible cook who would rather watch sports while cleaning his gum and drinking a beer than help his daughter with a few chores. Early on in the series, Stephanie Meyer makes it pretty damn clear that Bella belongs in the kitchen.
Reason 2- Edward breaks into Bella’s home and watches her sleep before introducing himself even once.
Reason 3- In book two, Bella falls apart when Edward leaves. She begins recovery when she starts spending time with Jacob.
This one is anti-feminism 101, folks. Bella needs a man in her life. She can’t function without one. It’s exactly that simple.
That will be the first message I teach my daughters. How about you?
Reason 4- Edward frequently dictates whom Bella may be friends with and encourages his family to spy on her and prevent her from disobeying his wishes.
Has anyone else ever read those terribly disheartening stories about girls with abusive boyfriends printed in every teen magazine ever created? They like to include lists of signs of potential abusive boyfriends to make sure we prevent these things.
One of the first things on the list? He tries to control every aspect of your life, including whom you can be friends with and with whom you can hang out.
But Edward just wants to protect her, girls say. He cares about her.
Oh, really? Well, let’s move on to Fact 5 before we finish this discussion.
Reason 5- Edward withholds sex in order to get what he wants. He succeeds.
All Edward wants is a wife.
All Bella wants is sex.
Contrary to what Edward believes, there’s nothing wrong with that. Bella is not some delicate flower that can be sullied or dirtied.
Can we just throw that out? That there’s some merit to purity? I know we’ve been working on that, but lovely Stephanie just threw us back approximately seventy-five years.
You see, Bella can make her own decisions. From when she has sex, to whom she hangs out with- Bella should have control over her life and her choices.
When she’s with Edward? He has the control.
Reason 6- While Edward encourages Bella to have hopes and dreams, Bella would much rather cook and clean and care for their family, and whatever else vampire housewives do.
And here is the real genius in Stephanie Meyer’s plan.
Most of us know Mrs. Meyer is a conservative Mormon who enjoys promoting abstinence in her spare time. Did you know she also promotes the idea that all women really want is to stay home and cook and clean?
In the Twilight Saga, Edward doesn’t push Bella to stay home with him and care for his every whim. He pushes her to do many things, but not that. No, he encourages her to get an education and have a life.
But Bella, Bella, is the one who wants nothing more than to stay home and care for their (eventual) daughter and her adoring husband.
Let me be perfectly clear here. There is nothing wrong with stay-at-home moms. There is nothing wrong with women who want to have families and to be the one to care for them. But there is something wrong when Bella doesn’t want to work outside the home, when Bella’s mother doesn’t work, when Esme doesn’t work, when literally none of the women in Twilight work outside of the home.
No, there is nothing wrong with wanting to care for your family. There is everything wrong with telling young girls that that is their only option.
Finally...
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
And yes, I did realize how NOT feminist the entire saga was. And I picked up on the way the whole book is really about needing a man to be happy, and waiting until marriage for sex, and not having an abortion even if it nearly kills you... or takes away your mortality. All valid choices for Bella to make, but as you said, it doesn't seem like she thinks they're choices at all. So yes, all of that did bother me, as it should.
Which is why I was so glad to see this all outlined here. I do believe that Stephanie Meyer has a talent for writing a really great, captivating love story. But I just wish she'd done it in a more healthy way. What if Bella had gotten her way once in a while? What if Esme's career (she does have one actually, she's an architect) had been highlighted as much as Carlisle's (so that you might actually remember it ;) )? What if Rosalie had been just as strong as Emmett, and maybe that actually made them a perfect match? What if Meyer had used her talent to explore what the many relationships in her book would look like if all parties were equal?
Ms. Meyer, if you're out there, could you write me a love story like that?
Thanks for your comments!
For instance: In reason one, you make it seem like Bella is a damsal in distress rather than a heroine simply because she likes to cook and clean. I like to cook and clean and I hardly consider myself a damsal. I do it because I enjoy it. Why does Bella have to be a damsal? Charlie, I'll agree, was character cast by Myers to be a "typical man."
In reason two, I really cannot argue. It is down right creepy...no matter WHO'S doing it.
Reason three is where I really begin to have my problems with this list. Bella made it clear, very clear, that Jacob is not boyfriend type. She spends time with Jacob because he is her BEST friend. He's a boy. So freakin' what?! That's like saying because I'm a girl, if my best friend is a boy I must want him. What a crock of shit. What if my relationship with a boy falls apart and I turn to a girl (who I'm secretly in love with)? Would it have been overlooked because it's a girl I'm spending my time with and girls are fraile and can be lived without?
Reason four and five are rather similar. Edward does seem controling in the beginning of Eclipse where he attempts to keep Bella from Jacob. I actually at that point considered putting down the book and walking away because I was upset that he would be acting like that towards Bella, his supposed true love, and he is becoming controling. However, I pressed on, and I'm glad I did. Later, Jacob and Edward talk and realize that, though they may not like each other, they are both going toward the same similar goal, which is to protect Bella. Edward then backs down and allows Bella to chill with Jacob on a more regular basis. Also, inform me HOW Edwards family spies on Bella. The only time the family, in my opinion, gets even CLOSE to spying on Bella is when they are around her house protecting not just her, but Charlie (remember our type-casted father) from unseen danger. As for the sex issue...Bella wants sex and Edward wants sex as well I'm pretty damn sure. There is nothing that says in the book that he does not. Plus, he's quite the protagionist when it comes to him making out with her and holding her close and the like. After all actions are the reverberations of our deepest wishes. The only reason Edward is throwing down the marriage card is in hopes that Bella, once married, will decide not to be changed to a vampire. And you know what? As a 20 year old college student I will admit that I find that not only pretty damn chivalrious but sweet as well. He cares enough about her soul and the ability to keep her from turning to a monster that he would throw down the marriage card, which would ACTUALLY be less "ever after" than being turned into an eternal living vampire.
Reason six I also agree with to an extent. Bella doesn't want to lead a life outside of the home because it is her choice and there is nothing wrong with being a caring housewife. I think the world could use a few more caring housewives and/or husbands. The thing I do think is wrong is that Bella's mother does nothing but follow Phill around and abandon her daughter. So maybe when discussing this you should turn your attention away from Bella and to Renne and Phill.
Reason seven is where I am in complete disagreement with you and actually honestly flabbergasted (or maybe it's just the title of your reason). I'm sorry you've been hurt, or attacked, or never had "true love' or what have you but to say something is wrong with Edward for truly loving Bella presents me with a large extent of discuss. In fact, lack of love, in my opinion, is what leads some (maybe even most) back to typical "ball and chain" roles. They cook and clean because they feel like that's what is expected of them. They think men will help them make their decisions. They think they are worthless without them. But, honey, that is not love. That is creepy as hell. Edward does not do these things (other than the stalking which I don't think anyone can find attractive). Rather, you look into the book for a double meaning (as most English Lit majors do) and push your brooding, overly-feminist opinons upon others when in reality, this is a love story. Edward falls in love with a clumsy girl who happens to be happy when she is cleaning and cooking. Bella is adored by all not because she is a quiet and unflawed character, but because she is freakin' likeable. I like Bella. She's relatable. Who hasn't cooked? Or done dishes? Or been clumsy? Or been grounded? Or whatever other poor excuse for anti-feminism you have cooked up? Bottom line. It's a book. An idea yes. But an ideal? No.
I don't think I've ever been so offended.
I was, initially, very flattered by your comment, but some of the things you said were not just condescending, but downright offensive.
I was going to respond. I actually have typed a number of responses ranging from polite to seriously bitchy, and I think this one is the most appropriate. I'm not going to respond to your arguments. I will tell you, however, the next time you want answers from someone you should probably not assume they're been hurt, or attacked, or are bitter, are too feminist (not possible), or are too English Lit major-y... You should probably be nice. Because, you know what? I just think you're a bitch now. And I don't give a flying fuck whether or not you agree with me, because you're obviously a jerk.
1: The problem in 1 is not that it portrays Bella as a damsel in distress, so much as a damsel in apathetic acceptance. She seems to think of doing some chores around the house as a "thank you for room and board," and that's not problematic. It is, however, a bit problematic when the chores are stereotypical womanly chores while her manly police chief father watches sports and drinks beer. If he did dishes and she chopped firewood, it would feel like she was simply helping out. Instead, it felt like she gravitated toward the gendered role due to it being her proper role, and that was icky. I don't remember her watching cooking shows, reading books, or experimenting with new recipes. I don't remember anything that suggested she cooked out of a love of cooking, and I suspect she didn't love it.
2: Yeah, stalking is creepy.
3: The problem with Jacob isn't only that it was the handsome, suddenly-grown-up male friend that she hung out with. There's also the question of, what happened to those people she befriended at the school? What happened to people she knew before moving to this town? She made Jacob into a rebound-friend. It doesn't have to be sexual to have the connotation that she needs a man to hold her together.
4: This point was a bit exaggerated, sure. As far as I see, the problem isn't for Bella, but in the example provided by Bella being warned family/friends that Edward seems dangerous and her then ignoring them. I'm scared of girls being in absuive, controlling relationships, warned by people who care for them to get out while they can... thinking of Twilight, and convincing themselves that it's not dangerous as long as it's true love. It doesn't matter if Edward means well, the behavior is still disturbing and problematic.
5: I seem to remember points an instance when Edward references to her infatuation with him being equivalent to intoxication, and takes her keys away. Her response was essentially to giggle, agree, and think to herself that she would never disobey him. So, sure, Edward isn't overtly controlling her with sex. He may not even be doing so intentionally! But she is allowing herself to be controlled by him, and that's creepy if nothing else. I think it's dangerous and thing to warn people away from, but that is belief and not necessarily fact.
You pointed to how Edward encourages Bella to stay in school, get an education, choose her own path in life, and not become a monster frozen in time. Her choice was to say no, I don't want to do all that, I want to be with you and the same age as you forever. If he had been 23 when he was turned, would she have felt the same? Would she still have wanted to be turned asap, or would she have been willing to experience a little more of life? Was it that she feared death, or was she simply so vain as to hold her physical appearance as more important than everyone else she had ever known and cared about?
6: Bella is 17. Yes, she grew up quickly thanks to her parents being neglectful of her emotional needs, but she hasn't had much varied experience in life. She's quite accustomed to caring for the home while other people go around living more active lives. I wouldn't mind her choice if I thought she actually had the experience to decide that freely. As it is, her life's calling might lie in being a potter and traveling around the country, and because she chose so early, she may never know this. Immortality means that she may eventually discover it, but readers aren't likely to be immortalized by vampires, and so it does provide a bad example.
7: The main point, being in bold, is that Edward truly loves Bella. As I see it, the problem is again in the example that this provides. All the previous points and problems are somehow brushed aside because it's fiction, it's fantasy, and it's romantic? Stalking is all right, as long as it's done for love. "This is a love story. This is what true love looks like."
Twilight features characters who make dubious choices; Bella wanting to abandon her friends and family for the sake of immortality made it impossible for me to strongly relate to her throughout the series. Stalking your loved one, or abandoning friends and family to spend all your time with your loved one, are held as examples of true love. If the characters only had the desire to do so, I could relate. But Edward actually stalks Bella. Bella begs Edward to kill her because being older than him is now one of the most terrible things she can imagine. I don't relate to this! I'm freaking disturbed by this, and I am disturbed by the idea that millions *do* relate to it.
If I thought that all the people who read this did see it a merely a book, merely an idea, I would be happy. This would be an interesting story with odd characters, and the makings of many conversations about what people are willing to do out of love. Some of the girls who gather at book-signings, line up for movies, and go to see the celebrities cry out "I want to marry you, Edward!" They mean it. These girls are not in love with a person who protected them from attackers, or held them in a close embrace. They're in love with the idea of such a person... they're in love with the *ideal* of love, and this is the example they're currently clinging to. If they're not going to treat it as merely a book, then for their sake---and for the sake of younger girls who have not yet made their mistake---I'm going to treat as more than merely a book too.
A little context: I am 22, a female college graduate who focused on visual arts. I took only one feminist theory class in my time, and while I took a few philosophy courses I never took anything in English lit. I read a lot, and quite a few of the books I read are better than Twilight---I suggest Tamora Pierce's books as being lovely for young adults. I'm in a long-term relationship with a male, and I do most of the cooking and cleaning while he holds the steady job that pays for most of our bills. This is not my ideal, but it's where I am in life right now.
I wish there were more books that were, like Twilight, engaging and interesting to a majority of readers that featured a wider range of people. I wish there were house-wives and house-husbands, people with one job, two jobs or no jobs regardless of gender, based only on their interests and motivations. I know there are small amounts of people who do accurately fit gender roles, but the vast majority do not, and throwing the roles out of our expectations would be wonderful. Unfortunately, I don't trust that it will ever happen.
I read all four in four days to pass some time at a terribly slow job. I don't have any problem with people reading them, I find it bothersome that so many girls read it and idolize the kind of relationship Bella and Edward have. Read it, but don't aspire to live it.
If I remember correctly, there are multiple times in the books where Charlie feels guilty about her doing the cooking because he isnt very good at it, and I dont think I remember her doing any other chores than cooking or washing the dishes. It also isnt so much that she would rather stay at home and do all the house work, she still goes to school and does her homework, just she makes the dinner because she knows her dad isnt a very good cook (I think he tries to make dinner for her in one of the books as well)
I don't think you raised this point though: Bella is portrayed as quite clumsy and feeble throughout the books, whereas Edward is extremely fast and strong, and its emphasised quite a bit that he could easily kill her in a second if he wanted/was too careless. I think heor her also raises the point somewhere in the books that she practically needs him to survive, because she is so accident prone.
I know I've missed a few points, and this is definitely one that I wish I would've added. Edward says on numerous occasions that Bella would probably just die if Edward weren't around to save her.
I too am an English major and I am currently in an education program to become a teacher. My friend loves these books and I read the first one just to see what she was freaking out about. I forced myself to finish it because only then would I feel I had earned the right to express my hatred for it.
When I say I hate it, she says it is just because I'm an english major and I'm "snotty about books." She says I should get over it because it's for young girls to read. There is my problem right there. The thing that bothers me is that Meyer breaks pretty much every grammar and syntax rule that exists for the English language. School-age children, even those in high school, should not be exposed to horrible writing and have it assumed as acceptable. Harry Potter was written well, and there are children as young as 7 reading those books on their own. Also, I really hope Santa brought Meyer a thesaurus for christmas, so that maybe the next time she writes a book she won't use the same "juicy" word 10 times on a page. It would have been more effective if you just used it once, honey. Oh, and the word "unloosened" isn't even a word. And if you want to go around coining your own phrases, at least do it properly. To "unloosen" would be the opposite of loosening something, therefore, to tighten. Don't say "unloosen" when "loosen" is what you are trying to say. What kind of crap editor let all this garbage through the filter?
All rules of the English language set aside, I tried to get past the horrible writing and get excited for the final fight scene. I was sadly let down when it was from Bella's perspective, who was unconscious. Really, Stephanie? I see your plan. This was all a ruse so that you wouldn't have to write a descriptive paragraph about the fight because you knew it would be awful!
I refuse to read any of the other books. I don't like the idea of emo-bella.
Needless to say, I think the casting of Kristen Stewart as Bella was perfect, as my distase for her acting skills mirrors my loathing of Meyer's writing skills.
At least Hermione has a mind of her own and can be considered her own person.
Team Harry Potter!
Yet, let me genuinely assist you in your future as a writer/critic.
1) Be less emotional. I understand you may be upset Twilight isn't pro femenism, but nothing truly is. Do not wrap yourself up in emotions about how backwards SMeyer's "writing" has been. Instead, objectively criticize her work with perhaps just one phrase: Her books are mindless.
2) Her books are mindless. There's not much else to talk about Twilight for, move on with your life as a literature scholar. If i spend my time worrying about the small things in life, I will be one miserable person. She has found a way to exploit the tween/teen/young female adult demographic by romanticizing fantasy creatures. I have found more profound things in life to love and only make me realize how insignificant telepathic vampires are.
3) Fuck it, mormons are pretty sad people so if it may help her life to poison young minds and make money at the same time, get back at her by showing young minds what there is to love in life that isn't fantasy. Everyone needs an escape from reality... females more than males need a romantic escape. To step four.
4) "All things with great beauty contain great depth". Rather then waste time, energy, and thought on how terrible Twilight is, use your limitless intellectual abilities to write something with emotional intelligence and a beautiful depth. Fast forward 50 years from now and you may learn that your writings will be in turn much more popular than twilight because shallow, mindless things have a shelf life... measurable in months, and then life moves on. Movies and books that hit you deep never have a shelf life because they are timeless.
In all, I appreciate that you hate Twilight as much as I do, but we don't need to concern ourselves with the reasons. There is no intrinsic opposition between male and female unless you think it so. I am a man and yet I appreciate the same things in life you do, do not seperate us because you think there is a greater force of anti-femenism at work.
Peace and Love, brothers and sisters.
I loved what you wrote. I agree with it, and I couldn't have said it better myself.
Thank you, my friend. Thank you!
One of the other things that I think Twilight teaches young girls is spousal abuse. Bella is constantly saying that Edward could kill her at any moment etc. but its okay because he loves her. Stephenie Meyer is practically preaching that a man can hurt you as long as he truly loves you!
like pokahontas (WHICH ACTUALLY MEANS SPOILED ONE) the idea of a 'perfect' woman has been exploited, and fit-NOT TO FIT THE TUNE OF HAPPINESS- but the perfect republican, beer drinking, deer shooting man who needs someone to clean up the mess he leaves in his wake. five stars... you're on to something
Well, sort of. You are a brave soul for having read the entire series. Me? I got halfway through book one and couldn't go on because of the feelings of rage it inspired. Also, when someone asks me why I don't like Twilight, it's all I can do not to fly into a blind fury. It completely inceses me for all the reasons you mentioned.
That said, I have to say that this is one of the most well-articulated articles on the Twilight Saga and why it sucks that I have come across. You outlined your points in a clear, concise way, which is sometimes really hard to do when talking about an issue that pisses you off.
So yeah, I applaud you. Thank you for putting into words what I couldn't (at least not as eloquently), and thank you for being an informed, intelligent human being who realizes that there is something not right here, perhaps even disturbingly so.
As for arguments that "Twilight" promotes feminism, again, I think that hardly warrants attention. I have never heard such an argument, and can't believe it needs debunking. In fact, I ran a search for articles arguing that Twilight is pro-feminism, and could find nothing of the sort, only a slate of articles and blogs very similar to this one.
Why are we wasting our time studying such crap when there are matters of consequence that need attention? I urge you to sharpen your analytical acumen pondering issues that have relevance beyond the teenage years.