TRIGGER WARNING: This post is about a scene of domestic violence and includes a graphic description.

The show Glee is a favorite topic lately in the sexual health world. It seems like the general consensus is that while it has its issues, it's a step in the right direction because it's a sex-positive show.
Even as its issues seemed to pile up, I still really liked Glee. Until last night when I saw the latest episode, "Mattress," on Hulu.
This latest episode of Glee contains an alarming scene of domestic violence. What's more alarming is how un-alarmed most people -- including all the characters on the show -- seem to be.
So here's what happened:
Terri, Will's wife, has been pretending for a while now that she's pregnant because she is afraid her husband will leave her otherwise. In this scene, he finds out, and confronts her -- using violence and intimidation based on his size and strength.
Yet somehow, Will definitively comes across as the victim, and Terri as the scheming, manipulative person.
So I did what any incoherent, raging person would do in my place and googled "glee mattress violence." And thankfully I came across the blog "this ain't livin': [everything] is a feminist issue." And the blogger "meloukhia" says it all a whole lot better than I could. Seriously, read the entire article.
meloukhia writes,
I know some people might think I am overreacting, but I am going to just go ahead and say that this actually IS a big deal. Every time a moment of domestic violence is treated like it's not domestic violence is inappropriate and wrong. Especially when it's on a TV show that a lot of people watch and that is supposed to be sex-positive. This was not "borderline domestic violence." There is NO SUCH THING.“Mattress” marked the Unmasking of the Deceptor; finally, Will learned the truth about Terri’s pregnancy. And what happened? Did we have a touching scene in which she confessed that she was worried Will was going to leave her, and she thought she was pregnant and she panicked when the doctor said she wasn’t? Did we have A Serious Conversation in which they talked about what was happening with their marriage? (Perhaps as a warning and sobering counterpoint to the doomed marriage Emma is about to embark upon.)
No, we did not.
We learned why Terri is so frightened of Will. We learned, in fact, that Terri had good reason to be terrified of Will, and to be afraid of the consequences of confessing the truth about her pregnancy.
We had domestic violence. We had Terri in the kitchen, cooking (of course, that’s where women should be, right?) and Will stormed in. There was screaming. Things were thrown. Terri was backed in the counter, trapped, physically overpowered by Will. He grabbed her wrist, quite harshly. And screamed some more.
“You’re scaring me,” she said, and Will kept right up with the violence.
The scene ends with Will, Righteous Deceived Will, storming out of the house.
“Come back,” Terri sobs.
This is a scene that plays out every day in households all over America.
And we’re supposed to view Will as a sympathetic character?
Evidently we are, because the rest of the episode featured him. We never saw Terri again. And everyone made sure to sympathize with poor Will and his tough family life, because of course Will didn’t mention the fact that he physically and verbally assaulted his wife.
Glee, you have just crossed a line you cannot come back from. I thought that line had already been crossed, but I was wrong. The minute you depicted domestic violence and cast the abuser as the hero of the piece, you went irrevocably to a Dark Place. There is no redemption from here; I don’t care how Will’s character is being set up and how he is supposed to be read, in this episode, he was a Wronged Man and a Tragic Hero who assaulted his wife.
My guess is that the writers were trying to make Will's character deeper and give Matthew Morrison a chance to air his acting chops but they really could have found a better opportunity.
I wrote an article similar to this on Lady Gaga's Paparazzi. Glee has rabid fans so I doubt this will change anything or make people question the direction of the writing at times. I would be interested in seeing someone defend this scene in the name of art.
I didn't mean to imply that domestic violence is purely physical -- you are right to underscore that it comes in many forms, including emotional.
You are also right to point out that women can abuse men -- I didn't mean to imply that only men can abuse women. Men can abuse women, women can abuse men, women can abuse women, men can abuse men.
I do agree with you that their relationship is unhealthy, and that many of Terri's actions have been wrong. But I'm hesitant to equate Terri's manipulative actions with abuse.
As for Terri "being the real abuser, not Will"? I can't agree with you on that. For one thing I think it's problematic to try to compare different types of abuse as being more "real" than others.
Maybe Patrick Stewart's recent article in The Guardian about domestic violence in his family growing up will give you something to think about. He says,
On a different note, you commend Will for walking away from the situation, arguing that he was giving himself time to cool down until they could talk about the situation positively. I agree with you that walking away/cooling down is the right thing to do, but I didn't get the impression Will was doing it because he realized his anger was out of control -- it seemed more like he was walking away because he couldn't stand being around her and just wanted to get away from her. I mean it was the right decision for him to leave, but I question the assumption that he was walking away for the right reasons.
I guess one of my main issues, besides the actual event, was Will's glaring lack of remorse for his violent actions, and the show's glaring lack of outrage/shock after the violence -- the show carries on as if they merely had a serious argument, rather than a scene of intimidation, fear, and violence. Acting like it was no big deal made it a big deal.
In fact, and this is a larger issue, had Terri been a man he was angry with, no one would have cried foul. Or if Terri had grabbed his wrist, or even pushed him and hit him, no one would have called it domestic violence. There is a double standard when it comes to violence and gender, and yes, there is a certain amount of logic behind it. Generally men are larger and somewhat stronger than women. However, that does not mean that every time a man is angry with a woman, and does anything to show his anger, that he is abusive. It just means he's angry. Now, if we had seen a pattern of Will raging at his wife, or of him intimidating her and of her being scared of him and submissive to him, then yes, I would agree that the show had crossed a line. However, had that been his character, no one would ever have seen him as a hero in the first place. This is not a case of abuse or domestic violence, this is justified anger.
Thanks for your comment.
In terms of Terri being abusive...please see the comments I made above in my response to nothingrhymeswithemily.
One of the main points where we disagree is over whether or not Will was violent. Using physical force against another person is violence. And that's what Will did. Sharply grabbing Teri's wrist, ripping a baby pad off her stomach, and backing her into a wall is not using physical force for Terri's benefit.
Another point we disagree over is whether or not shouting is abusive. There are many ways that an abusive relationship manifests itself, and physical violence is only one. Shouting can absolutely be (and often is) a characteristic of abusive relationships.
You said that if Terri had grabbed Will's wrist, pushed him, or hit him, no one would have called it domestic violence. This is just not true. I'm not saying that Will's violence is unacceptable because he is a man. I am saying that is violence is unacceptable because violence is unacceptable. No matter who it's between.
Twice in your comment you say that Will's anger was justified. I agree with you. Will had a pretty serious reason to be angry. But justified anger does not equal justified violence. While anger can be justified, violence can never be. Though Will's anger is justified, his violence is not.
Name-calling and put-downs
Keeping the victim from seeing or talking with friends and family
Telling the victim what to do
Threats of violence or harm, or to expose the victim’s secrets such as sexual orientation or immigration status), or to take away the victim’s children (which can be expanded, I'm sure, to include using the victims children to manipulate them.)
Looking at these, it's pretty clear that Terri shows signs of being an abuser.
Grabbing Terri's wrist? Not right. But I am loathe to say it's domestic violence. In this scene, I was scared that Will would hit her or do something inappropriate -- but he didn't. He did not. He reacted in a perfectly normal way and managed to hold himself back from anything further.
I agree with those who say Terri is the abuser. She's been manipulative and abusive to pretty much everyone (the Glee kids when she gave them drugs; Quin when she refused to pay for medical expenses despite the fact that that's the normal expectation for adoptive parents; Will by lying to him about the fact that they were going to have a daughter). She's not a scared woman lying to protect herself. She's a cruel person lying to protect her status quo.
But I still stand by what I said before about Will's actions being violent and frightening, and violence being unacceptable. To me, it's as simple as that. Will's anger may have been justified, but justified anger does not equal justified violence.
A couple people have pointed out that this was a one-time incident, while domestic violence often includes a pattern of abuse. Maybe I was too quick to label this incident domestic violence. It was certainly violence, but it was not necessarily a part of a larger pattern of Will abusing Terri. My main point was that this the violence was unacceptable, and I was shocked and disappointed that the show treated it as such.
Thanks again for all of your thoughtful responses.
The description of the scene left out some details. For instance, that Terri had been manipulating Will from episode 1, twisting him into making decisions solely for her gain, though he was the only one paying for it. She complains constantly about working "3 hours a day, 4 days a week" while Will worked two, sometimes three jobs to provide her "the lifestyle to which [she was] accustomed". Terri used her pregnancy as a way of keeping Will under her control. She didn't show any real desire to have a child or concern for a child; she only seemed interested in the additional power it would give her. She almost convinced Will to give up teaching (the career he loved) to take an accounting job because it made more money. She talked him into buying a house that was far beyond their budget, and only backed out of it when she realized that him working around the clock left little time for sex and decreased her chance of getting pregnant. Once she started wearing the fake baby bump, she refused to let him touch her at all--no hugs, no kisses, he couldn't touch her stomach, couldn't even sleep near her. She used her sister, her ObGyn, and Will's students to deceive him. All this manipulation and these lies was not mentioned in the article. Presented with all the facts, his anger seems a bit more reasonable.
Another point to touch on: Yes, Terri was in the kitchen. It was one of the very few times we saw her there. In all previous episodes, she had refused to cook, forcing Will to provide dinner (as well as bringing her lunch during his lunch break) on most occasions. If I remember correctly (forgive me if I'm wrong), she wasn't even cooking. She was simply debating where she would order take-out for that night (since she and Will were having a conversation about not wanting Chinese again merely minutes prior to the confrontation scene). Although I hardly believe a woman should be confined to the kitchen, I do believe that marriage is an equal partnership, and that there is nothing wrong with Terri doing her share of the cooking and providing for the family.
As far as your definition of violence: It must be noted that Will entered the kitchen angrily, but still maintaining a level of calm. He kept his voice low. Only when Terri persisted in lying to him--even after it was obvious she had been caught--did Will raise his voice. Such a reaction is understandable. He's human; we all lose control at times. He didn't call her derogatory names; he didn't threaten her. He just told her to stop lying to him, which is a perfectly reasonable reaction, and better than the reactions of most men in similar situations. He grabbed her wrist and pulled up her shirt, but only because she refused to do so herself. He didn't hurt her. He wasn't even that rough with her. He was firm. Again, his reaction was that of anger, but it was a perfectly human response and much better than what I had expected.
Of course there was no calm, rational conversation in which Terri expressed her worries and fears, giving Will the chance to understand. Will had opened up numerous opportunities for Terri to talk to him about the "pregnancy" and what was going on in her life; Terri always either brushed him off or lied to him. Terri shut him out of her life entirely. It's impossible to have a conversation to resolve issues and discuss concerns when the one with the concerns refuses to admit them and instead resorts to manipulation and lies.
So while Will's anger was somewhat unattractive, it was hardly abusive.