LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES

Website Blog
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Videos
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 3:30:00 PM EST

The producers of the art-house thriller Black Swan understood the perils and possibilities of their film being accepted by a limited audience. Having passed the box office test with an average critical rating of an A-, however, fears have subsided. Ranking in at number seven on Entertainment Weekly's “25 Movies You Need to See Before Oscar Night,” the niche film is holding its ground against the more-mainstream contenders like The Social Network, Inception, and the same-sex family drama The Kids are All Right.

Having seen the film, and knowing many that have, people cannot seem to stop talking about it; just search related posts on Facebook and you'll see the nonstop status updates about Black Swan. And it's all for good reason. Watching it is a visual roller coaster, one that will leave you mentally exhausted as it runs course. Natalie Portman's character continuously plays with the fine lines of reality. The film is intense, the kind that has you hugging your knees as the simple plot unfolds (or maybe that's just me).

If this sounds like a push to go see it, then maybe it is. And while you're at it, consider the thing that everyone else seems to have overlooked: in an attempt to reach a wider audience of both men and women, the producers strategically inserted a lesbian sex scene with Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis. Now, I am not an expert on the original “vision” of the film, nor have I spoken with the Director. But am I the only one who is uncomfortable with the notion that filmmakers can insert some girl-on-girl action to elicit box office results? Consider Portman's statement in Entertainment Weekly (#1136, January 7, 2011):

Everyone was so worried about who was going to want to see this movie. I remember them [producers] being like, 'How do you get guys to see a ballet movie? How do you get girls to a thriller?' And the answer is a lesbian scene...Everyone wants to see that.

Two women having sex, according to the producers of this film, has the appeal to invite the gender-stereotyped male or female to a thrilling, ballet presentation. Is lesbian sex just an entertainment tool for Hollywood executives to fill their pocket? Obviously, the answer is no. I know plenty of lesbian couples that would very well be offended to hear that two women making love can be classified as a deal breaker, the icing on the cake—the representative of the bizarre or the must-see-to-believe.

I have a problem with any type of same-sex sex being glorified for entertainment purposes, particularly when such entertainment fills the sensory enjoyment of people that see a film like Black Swan just to claim the conversation piece of having seen Portman and Kunis go at it. Forgive me if I'm being sensitive, but I do not see this as a positive thing for the lesbian or women communities. Lesbians should not be equated as being a part of a freak show.

I won't tell you not to see Black Swan, but please refrain from going just to gawk at the ordinary sex made unnecessarily extraordinary. 

(On a side note, Director David Aronofsky also directed Requiem for a Dream, the novel-made-movie that also includes a lesbian sex scene. The one in Requiem, however, is different because it is a significant part of the plot in the novel. In fact, the scene is painfully moving, and offers much insight into the character. Perhaps his previous work shows his present inspiration.)

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
I found your perspective interesting. While these scenes can help people become more accepting of alternate lifestyles, the intent is still to sell tickets. I guess progress is good, but to throw it in to get people talking is an unfortunate way to create tolerance and acceptance.
# Posted By  Alysha_MySistahs | 1/16/11 08:41 PM | Reply
 Considering the character of Nina not only flirted with lesbian sex, but also masturbation and promiscuity, it served the story inasmuch as showing how this girl is becoming completely unhinged and reckless and destructive. While yes, perhaps the director is aware that the sex scene would draw attention and get the movie press, doesn't that happen all the time in Hollywood? What about "I Love You, Phillip Morris"? What about "Brokeback Mountain"? Why is it that a scene of lesbian sex that serves the story or reinforces emerging recklessness of the main character is frowned upon, but no one seems to mind sex between males?

It almost seems like there is a double standard where lesbian sex = exploitation, whereas homosexual male sex = art.
# Posted By GinaBoBina | 1/17/11 11:54 AM | Reply
To somewhat address your resonse, I think that it is true that there exists a double standard of sorts. People are probably more likely to pay to see two women have sex than two men, which in essence is the problem I have.

And if I could propose a solution to your sex v. art idea, it would be to make sex natural in film, not forced. Perhaps my problem is better rooted in Portman's comments abouth the scene than the scene itself. The notion that people might see the film merely because of some lesbian scene is somewhat problematic to me.
# Posted By drs0043 | 1/23/11 04:09 PM | Reply
 Thanks for this diary...but two things.  First of all, almost every Hollywood movie uses some aspect of sex to sell tickets.  It is pretty much a given in western society, and the fact that it was a lesbian scene doesn't make that too different in my mind.  

Second, I found the scene to be crucial to the pllot.  It seems like Nita's exploration of darker, more adult ideas (pretty much what the black swan was a metaphor for) was showing her departure from her childhood ideas of herself, and the lesbian scene to me was the crucial point where she no longer was mommys little girl. Her characters development wouldn't have been the same without this scene. Also the sex was all in her head as she became more and more psychotic...which was just layers and layers of craziness.  

To me putting that scene in was just in line with how movies are made these days...and there isn't necessarily anything wrong with that.  If you are going to take issue with the sex in this particular movie you have to take issue with the hyper sexualization of hollywood in general, which is a whole other discussion.  
# Posted By  dandaman6007 | 1/17/11 11:39 PM | Reply

I agree with what you're saying, Dan. I guess my only thought is that for the people that only see this movie with apprehension, will they leave with a negative view on lesbians? Almost as though it is a reckless and deviant behavior. Anyone that knows someone who is gay is certainly more competent than that, but what about everyone else? It's something to consider.

I did really like the film.

Thanks for enlightening me!

# Posted By drs0043 | 1/23/11 04:18 PM | Reply