LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

by:  als233
Wednesday, June 24, 2009 at 10:53:00 AM EDT

In case you haven't heard yet, Burger King recently released an ad in Singapore for their newest creation, the BK Super Seven Incher. I mean, all you have to do is look at this advertisement (which I have pasted for you below) to see why it's worthy of blogging about.

Everything about the imagery and the language in this ad makes me actually never want to eat this sandwich, or anything else from Burger King for that matter. Maybe its the fact that the model in the ad looks like a creepy blow up doll? Maybe its the fact that the slogan "It just tastes better" is printed in big letters above the image of the Super Seven Incher, a sandwich that promises to "BLOW YOUR MIND AWAY."


Burger King has a little history of exploiting sex in its ad campaigns. Let's think back to the Spongebob Squarepants (square butts) commercial BK released a while ago....as a campaign for the kid's meals. Um, really? For the Kid's meals? I have also posted a link to this piece of art for your viewing pleasure.
          

Obviously, tactics like this are not new to the advertising world, I guess I was just hoping people could at least try and keep it classy. 

Thoughts?

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
CREEPY
# Posted By  AFY_Joe | 6/24/09 11:57 AM | Report | Reply
ok so I agree that the i like square butts commercial is creepy and a little strange for a kids meal because of its sexual nature i suppose. But the ad for the 7 incher i dont really have much of a problem with. I mean I may cringe a little but that is just because oral sex with male-bodied people tends to make me cringe a big- i prefer female bodies. But that is aside the point. I think its fun to bring sex into things. Why does sexuality have to automatically make something 'classless?" Isnt that a bit sex-negative?
I suppose you could look at the 7incher commerical from a feminist lense and say how it is a bit annoying that they had that woman there. It portrays women as just there to please men. Its pretty heteronormative becasue its a woman and something that is supposed to symbolize a penis, but heteronormativity is everywhere.
Overall that first ad doesnt really bother me i think tis funny, and I hate the way taht people see sexy and automatically think its inapropriate. Those kinds of attitudes just make sex something that is brushed under the rug and never discussed, and it is clear that sex is something that needs discussion.


# Posted By  ekimx425 | 6/24/09 02:53 PM | Report | Reply
Thanks for your thoughts - I appreciate your response. I have to say though, the argument I am making is not that sexuality in itself is "inappropriate" or  "classless", and I don't think that was the argument conveyed in the post. I am all about having a dialogue about sex, I agree that it is incredibly important to incorporate sexuality into pop culture, its a normal and fantastic part of life, BUT I do argue that the way in which we as a society and a culture frame our expressions of sexuality is really important. 

It is not about the fact that sexual innuendos are included in the campaign, it is the fact that this ad is perpetuating unhealthy and objectifying stereotypes. For example, could you really argue that the makers of this ad did not strategically place a beautiful, blonde women with red lipstick into this campaign? Like you pointed out in your comment, why do you think they chose this woman? Why didn't they choose a man, or use both? I think it's fun to bring sex into things also, as long as it is framed in a positive way. Call it personal opinion, but I don't think this campaign conveys sex in a positive light. 
# Posted By  als233 | 6/24/09 04:19 PM | Report | Reply
I agree that sex should be brought out more into the public sphere. I think that the unspoken taboo place on sexality increases occurences of sexual assult, and presents sex as a shameful act. A little more talk about sex in the public sphere could benefit us all.
Yet, the type of sexual aspects featured in these articles are not contructive to celebrating sexuality. These ads are totally commoditizing the female body to make an extra dollar. This not to mention the body image or gender roles it suggests to children.
Lets increase the discussion of sex, but lets not repeat the negative congitations and stereotypes that are presently hurting the mental health of all of us.

# Posted By twothumbsup | 6/24/09 04:24 PM | Report | Reply

I agree that sexuality should be publicly expressed - as it is a part of life.  But, I can't agree that it's something Burger King should place in an add such as the Spongebob Squarepants commerical.  That's obviously aimed towards kids - and young kids at that. 

And even though the first ad isn't all that bad...I would never associate anything sexual with BURGER KING.  So it ultimately leaves me even less attracted to anything they are selling.

# Posted By  mollyshunney | 6/25/09 12:33 PM | Report | Reply
Wow. I really like what people have said in the comments. It's definitely something to discuss.
I also agree that sexuality needs to be talked about and presented positively. I don't think that this BK ad does that.
It's so interesting to think about what we would be saying if this ad featured a man instead of a woman. I think in a way i would be more comfortable with that, because it wouldn't be so heteronormative. But as it is, I don't like this ad at all. I don't eat at BK, but if I did, I would stop because of this ad. I don't think you have to insinuate a blow job to sell a sandwich.
# Posted By Mahayana | 6/25/09 05:18 PM | Report | Reply