LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
In The Culture - Read More
Blog - Amplify your voice

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 8:12:00 AM EDT

Welcome to the world of Yes Means Yes!

I'm honored to be writing a weekly column for Amplify starting today. Just like I did in my anthology Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape, I'll be using this space to connect the dots between the diseased attitudes we have toward female sexuality, and the ways rape is allowed to function and flourish. The title is inspired by the idea that "no means no" is not enough - until women are equally free to say "no" and "yes" to sexual expression, we're still being treated like sexual objects instead of whole human beings. And that makes it a lot easier to rape us.

Case in point: have y'all been watching More To Love, the new "plus-size" version of The Bachelor? (It's OK if you have - we all have guilty pleasures. Heck, I watch American Idol and Gossip Girl. But more on that in another column.) A lot has been written about whether it's helping or hurting the fat acceptance movement, and that's an important conversation to have. But what's making me see red is the toxic combination of the women on the show believing that the shape of their bodies make them unworthy of love or sex, and the way these very same women are made to compete for the affection of one guy on national TV.

We know very little about Luke, the guy in question, except that he favors double entendres about "juicy meat" and calls women's bodies "bangin'". Oh, and there's one other thing - he is attracted to "larger" women. And that's enough to make nearly every woman on the show fall instantly in love. 

What makes this dynamic more dangerous than the normal Bachelor dysfunction is the level of desperation the women express. In interview after interview, we hear from women who've never been on a date before, who've been cheated on and verbally abused by the dates they did have, and who clearly believe that, because of their size, this guy being paid by Fox to date them all simultaneously is their only shot at love. Say what you will about what I'm now calling The Skinny Bachelor, but the women on that show certainly know that if they don't wind up marrying the guy on offer by the show, they will probably date again.

The truth is that there are plenty of people in the world who are attracted to sexual partners who are fat, or, more generally, whose bodies don't fit the young-white-skinny-busty-ablebodied ideal that dominates our pop culture. But the media does such a good job of shoving that ideal down our throats that these women are ready to do anything - anything - to win the affections of this exceptionally-average-seeming dude, just because he doesn't find their bodies gross. And if you don't already know what a perfect recipe that is for sexual coercion or date rape, check out this clip from the premiere, where Luke tells a girl that she has to kiss him if she wants to make the first cut: 






You can bet I'll be watching to see how bad it gets - and keeping you posted right here. In the meantime, what are your thoughts on More To Love - better or worse than your average reality show? And are there topics you want me to address in future columns? Have your say in the comments...

 

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
 First, Its exciting to have you write for Amplify!  I recently read the Purity Myth and Yes means Yes is on my list for books to read soon.  

Oh FOX, why do you piss me off SOO much?This show is obviously pathetic and vain, and my first instinct is to tune it out rather than think about it.  However, because you have done such a wonderful job explaining it, i have to say that this seems worse than the average dating show.  It is very disrespectful towards women, as are all "bachelor" style shows are.

In the end it just reinforces the skinny is perfect body image stereotypes that hollywood and pop culture "shove down our throats" (as you so nicely put it).  Because they show these women acting extremely desperate because of their body size, it just says the same old thing: that to be attractive you have to be unrealistically skinny, young, and (almost always) white.  If not, then you are unattractive, unwanted, will not get dates, and will have to beg any man for love and attention.  Its a disgusting message to have on TV, in my opinion.  

Thanks for writing about this!
-Dan 


# Posted By  dandaman6007 | 8/12/09 09:32 AM | Report | Reply
I've been afraid to watch it, though I've been following Jennifer Pozner's live-tweet of the show. I yell at the Twitter Machine instead of the TV.

And welcome to the awesomeness that is Jaclyn!!!!

# Posted By  AFY_Joe | 8/12/09 09:51 AM | Report | Reply
I'm sure what they were trying to do on this show was give the message that you don't have to be skinny and perfect to fall in love but they, FAIL! I've seen some of the commercials for this and after seeing that video above and reading your column, I can see now that the producers just wanted something "crazy" "whacky" and "fun" to get more ratings and have more publicity. I feel for these women who have put their emotions and lives on television because they feel this is the best way to find love. I would like to see you write about the season finale and tell us non-viewers what people got out of the show.
# Posted By adrianmchs | 8/12/09 01:31 PM | Report | Reply
Yay! I am so glad to see that you joined amplify! I have read some of Yes Means Yes and I just put a hold on it at the library so I can get it and read it ASAP! I am again so excited to read your work.
# Posted By  vanessaaishacoleman | 8/12/09 08:12 PM | Report | Reply
Yet another example of women in the media being made to equate their value (and thus the amount of respect they deserve to be treated with) to how attractive they are made to feel they are perceived as by men in general. So unfortunate. In my country often on the news after the report of the murder/rape/abuse of a woman/girl the relatives say things like 'but she was so pretty'
# Posted By themayaster | 8/13/09 09:20 AM | Report | Reply
 I'm so happy to see that you have a column!  I read Yes Means Yes (I actually reviewed it for Amplify), and I'm a big fan.  
Although the emphasis on the desperation of these women does frustrate me, I can't completely agree with your critique of the clip-- the woman in the clip is beautiful by most stereotypical beauty standards (cute, blonde, fair, big smile, big breasts), and it seemed like she wanted to kiss him.  While he did initiate the kiss, he used more of a pick up line than an ultimatum of "if you don't kiss me, you won't make the cut."  That said, in any of these shows there is an automatically AWFUL power dynamic.  If you're trying to impress a guy and make him like you (and on national television), you're probably not going to be perfectly comfortable making the decisions that you might normally make.  I would like to see more diversity beyond weight/body type: diversity of race, class, background, etc.
It's an interesting question and I may begin to watch this show so that I can throw in my two cents.
# Posted By  Leah627 | 8/13/09 09:17 PM | Report | Reply
Glad you're writing about this dismal show and exposing its manipulative, coercive nature. Before "More To Love" debuted I blogged ( http://bit.ly/XPkkj ) about how I feared it would be framed, and offered to appologize to the dynamic duo of sleaze (the show's exec producer Mike Fleiss, and Fox's programming suit Mike Darnell) if they proved me wrong and represented fat women in positive, empowered, sexy, stereotype-busting ways. Alas, it's as I feared: the only apology owed is from Fleiss and Fox to fat women. The show is just exactly as I expected it would be -- just as disheartening, exploitive and coercive as we all should have expected from Fleiss and Darnell. The pressure Luke employs to goad women into making out with him (and probably more as the series continues) is only likely to increase with every new episode. And viewers will be left with the
idea that non-skinny women *should* do whatever they "have" to, whenever they can, to land a gay - any guy - because (we're supposed to unuestioningly agree) their only other option is a lifetime as a lonely, unloved, sexless spinster.

And thanks to AFY_Joe for mentioning my Twitter livetweeting -- I've been livetweeting "More To Love" at @jennpozner and @realityTVbook this month. I'll livetweeted "The Bachelorette" earlier in the summer. I'm doing this because these are some of the shows I'm analyzing for "Reality Bites Back," a book I'm currently working on, that looks at representations of women in reality TV (and within that frame, race, class, consumerism, sexuality, masculinity, advertising and more). If
anyone has questions about reality TV, I'd love to talk about them on Twitter.
# Posted By jenniferpozner | 8/14/09 07:00 PM | Report | Reply
 Our culture is so riddled with double-standards it's amazing. We just posted a piece about this on my blog today -- specifically, about how the NYT Style section recently declared that potbellied men are IN!, while SELF magazine, in it's "Total Body Confidence" issue airbrushed Kelly Clarkson to a fraction of her real self, all while Tina Brown goes on the record calling Hillary Clinton fat. It's appalling. Check it out here:  http://undecidedthebook.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/oh-the-irony-whats-hot-and-whats-not/
# Posted By ShannonKelley | 8/14/09 07:14 PM | Report | Reply