LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 6:22:00 AM EST

Yesterday on Capitol Hill Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Senator Frank Lautenburg re-introduced the REAL Act, federal legislation that would for the first time in history put federal dollars toward comprehensive sex education.

I was honored to be at the press conference for the introduction of the bill; it's was like watching a dream I've had for a long time almost come true. I have a long history with abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, starting when I was fifteen in Lubbock, Texas. I've now spent eight years (more than 1/3 of my life!) as an advocate for comprehensive sex education because I've seen my generation lost to programs that put ideology before our health - and I don't want it to happen to the next one.

My school district had a strict abstinence-only-until-marriage policy - and some of the highest rates of STI's and unwanted pregnancy in the nation. Not only did we skip the anatomy portion of biology in deference to the ab-only policy, our "sex education" didn't start until high school - FAR too late to do us much good. During freshman year we were herded into the auditorium to listen to a lecture from a local pastor on 'Love, Sex, and Dating.'

As the culmination of every presentation, the pastor pulled a girl up onstage, produced a dirty, dingy toothbrush from his pocket and asked if she would brush her teeth with it. When she invariably said no, he pulled out another toothbrush, this one in its original box, and repeated the question. When she said she said yes to that one, he brandished the rejected toothbrush above his head and announced to the audience, “If you have sex before marriage, you are the dirty toothbrush.”

While this sounds extreme (and bizarre), abstinence-only-until-marriage programs commonly use degrading scare tactics like these, provide misinformation about condoms and contraceptions, forward generalizations about sexuality that are based on biases about gender and sexual orientation, and, as in my high school, contain religious messaging that violates the U.S. Constitution.

This year is the year to rid our schools of these programs and provide young people with medically accurate, age-appropriate comprehensive sex education that will equip them with the tools to make responsible decisions about sex and relationships throughout their lives. The REAL Act would do just that - send a letter to your representatives asking them to support the bill. (May I suggest donating your Facebook status to this link and tweeting and re-tweeting it, too?!)

This can be the year of youth - fitting after an election that mobilized a generation and elected a president that recognizes young people as assets to society who deserve more than junk science and ideology. Enough is enough - it's time for REAL sex education in America's schools.

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
AND we got to ride the magic underground Capitol shuttle :)
# Posted By  AFY_Joe | 3/18/09 10:16 AM | Report | Reply
That toothbrush thing makes me mad. It makes me wish that I could have been there, knowing what I know now, and stand up after he said that, and said, "You're wrong!"
# Posted By Mahayana | 3/18/09 02:04 PM | Report | Reply
We had comprehensive sex ed mostly, but once or twice the health teachers brought in abstinence presenters when they felt lazy. Rather than toothbrushes, it was two cups of water for us...1 clear and 1 with drops of different food coloring in it for people the hypothetical woman had sex with making it "dirty" brown. Then after the school received complaints, the second time we saw the presentation they didn't use the word dirty, but instead "differently colored". Because that way the 17 year olds won't catch on that you mean "dirty slut!".

It never worked in my classes anyway, we always picked the dirty water to marry because she seemed like she had more interesting life experiences to bring to the table. Except for Brad who reaffirmed that since he was gay, he chose neither cup and even if the cups represented men this didn't apply because he was not legally allowed to get married. Sigh....that makes me miss my crazy liberal hippie town

# Posted By  Abbey824 | 3/22/09 04:22 PM | Report | Reply