***Trigger Warning for discussions of violence and rape***
I’m going to write something very controversial, something that many folks will not agree with and I’m aware of this and I’d like readers to be aware also. Here goes: I do not completely believe that non-violent societies/communities are the most safe all the time. I write this knowing that violence manifests in complicated and multiple ways. If your idea of violence is just physical pain and issues of safety, please think of violence as larger than that. When people talk about state violence they are often discussing systems of oppression that are institutionalized (not just the death penalty as some may think). Violence comes in many forms and I admit that there are some forms and types of violence that I completely understand and could perhaps see myself becoming a part of or performing if put in certain situations.
For some time I’ve been wondering why people are so shocked and disappointed when women (anybody who identifies as a woman in this world) claim some level of violence (whether it be carrying pepper spray, a weapon (and as Ani DiFranco says “’cause every tool is a weapon if you hold it right”), or learning self-defense and/or martial arts (to name a few). Yes there are folks who think it’s problematic that women and other folks who must protect themselves must do so in our society/world and they talk about what that means and how it can possibly change. I’m not arguing against change, I’m urging us to think about how what some may call “violence” others may call “survival” and even “love,” a form of love so deep and revolutionary that it stems from a desire to survive and be liberated.
This is a topic I’ve discussed often regarding specific topics and people. The conversations around Rihanna’s “Man Down” video and song have inspired part of this post/thought process/desire for larger conversation. If you haven’t seen the video it is below and lyrics to the song can be found here.
The chorus of this song and the interpretations of the lyrics are what have sparked much conversation and debate. Some lyrics include:
Oh mama mama mama
I just shot a man down
In central station
In front of a big ol crowd
Oh Why Oh Why
Oh mama mama mama
I just shot a man down
In central station
Viewers and listenters are encouraged to connect these lyrics and Rihanna’s actions to revenge for a rape that occurred that we see in the video. Part of me wants to remind folks that Rihanna is not singing anything new, even for her. Can we think back to her first album Music of the Sun and her song “There’s A Thug In My Life” where she sings:
There's a thug in my life, how'ma gonna tell my mama
She gonna say it ain't right, but he's so good to me
There's a thug in my life, and its gonna cause crazy drama
I'm gonna see him tonight, I'm gonna give him everything
Here she’s invoking talking/telling her mother, just like in the “Man Down” song. She focuses on disappointing her mother, talking about how she is making decisions based on what she feels and knows is best for her. This is something that we often don’t provide or allow youth to do, we, adults, think we know “better” what is good for a young person than that young person knows for themselves. This goes totally against my positive youth development philosophy as well as my support of harm reductionist approaches. I digress.
Yet, I want us to have large conversations about violence. I’ve discussed in the past women of Color claiming a certain level of violence, something a student of mine from years ago mentioned and has stayed with me all this time. I spoke about this specifically with the Ivy Queen song “La Abusadora” which you can listen to here (it’s in Spanish only).
What about non-consensual violence such as beating and hitting an attacker, self-defense, in some forms of discipline, for protection, to cope, and to end colonial legacies? I want to be clear here, there are violent interactions that are consensual and I’ll talk about those in a moment. These examples above I’m thinking about in larger ways, not just issues of safety in our communities, also in public health, spiritual growth, liberatory goals, nationalists agendas, and freedom in general.
You see I struggle with this often. I appreciate the exchange within my community and online about this topic. There are parts of me that know when someone is murdered or harmed in particular ways that has an impact on a community in very specific ways. At the same time I understand why being violent in certain ways (I’m thinking a rape victim/survivor hurting/killing their rapist) can also create a safe( r) space. Then I struggle again with how we can build communities with that person/rapist who has violated other people in such a way. I am not comfortable with this being so dichotomous: either you are anti-violence or pro-violence. I think it is more complicated.
You see, I don’t think all forms of violence are forms of abuse. My homegirl Marie shared with me on twitter when I asked about violence always being a form of abuse her experience in her Krav class (a form of hand-to-hand combat/martial arts). That “I'm learning how to defend myself in class. Violence in a controlled environment is necessary in order to learn.” Controlling violence is something that is new for me as well to think about in this particular way. For example, when we discussed violence in my class last semester and then I asked students to write about it on their final exam, many of the men in the class wrote about boxing and a way to end boxing to have less violence communities. I was surprised that they thought this way, and realized we didn’t talk about “controlled violence” which is what boxing as a sport is in our society.
So, why don’t we believe youth and women and other folks who claim a certain level of violence to control that violence? To only use that violence when it is really needed (whenever that may be) but when they feel unsafe, need to protect themselves, or liberating their land, family, home, country? I think a lot of this idea lies in the “what if” fear. What if someone else was hurt? What if a melee occurs? What if people misuse that form of violence?
I think those questions are valid. I think they are also connected to ideas of power and who can claim power and when. I really appreciate Sofia Quintero’s (aka Black Artemis) list of “revenge films” to watch and discuss, which was also inspired by the Rihanna “Man Down” video. If you have not seen her last suggestion, the Descent, I’d like to hear about your impressions and thoughts about Rosario Dawson’s characters decision and actions. More importantly I’d like to hear folks talk more about pushing this conversation forward versus debunking it quickly.
I love this topic and I hope it continues to spark conversation in our communities about violence and it's use and abuse.
One thing I will say about controlled violence in terms of martial arts/combat training: As you learn more, you have a tendency to become more cautious. I'm only a beginnner but with the things I have learned, I know I can inflict serious harm on another human being and that is not something I take lightly. The result is that I am not likely to ever misuse what I have learned or abuse others. This is something that I hear from many other practitioners of martial arts or even sports like boxing. Once you have an idea of what you are capable of, you are far more careful about how and why you use those skills. Maybe that's part of the problem. If you don't know how much damage you can inflict, you may be more likely to hurt others simply because you're clueless as to the real consequences.
I love your commentary on realizing how much power you have once learning certain forms of defense. it's true, for many folks power comes in different ways: writing, singing, dancing, parenting, (to name a few) and martial arts is one of those! yes, power in which we can harm another person and being aware of that is something i have yet to find happens in any other form of power (like what i mentioned above).
i'm sure there are convos re: ethics, but there is not one i've heard about from a writing, singing, dancing perspective that discusses when such artists hurt others with their work and (mis)use? their power. it's very layered and complicated and i appareciate you sharing! xo
FWIW, I think it's worth noting that Rihanna is an artist and that what she's created is a piece of art; I think she's entitled to express herself in whatever way she deems appropriate. It's certainly not that off the wall to imagine a rape survivor revenge fantasy such as this and I commend her for expressing it to such a large audience.
i agree w/you regarding her being an artist. i agree. as i've mentioned before, for me, growing up i was raised to define art as producing knowledge. and i think for many viewers that is what Rihanna's video has done. here's a colorlines story of the director defending the video.
One more thing: Renee at Womanist Musings pointed out that the perpetrator is a dark-skinned African-American man and related that to colorism in general; i.e., why was that actor picked rather than a light-skinned man (a la Chris Brown), or a white or Asian or Latino man, or whatever. What do you think?
thanks, i havent read the WM story, but i think the colorism plays a role here. lots to speculate, i think it def plays on a usual dark=dangerous and bad and light=good and right meme. it's so tired, but it's still here so we got to talk about it!
do you think they could have used someone who is any lighter than this one character and folks not project that it could be seen as chris brown? perhaps they made a concious effort to try to curb those attempts by choosing someone who is more of everything CB is not in this video so that we could suspend that part of our knowledge of her relationship and see this as a story telling, a testimony that may not be her personal one with CB, but one nonetheless. perhaps they wanted to avoid the "did CB rape rihanna" ish. and i totally get that.
perhaps they also wanted to hire local talent, regardless the issue remains. the fact remains. i think they also chose someone who is as muscular and athletic as this person to represent a certain type of masculinity and power as well. very crafted and constructed message and lots of different perspectives!
Rihianna is so puzzling to me. I don't think we can ever tolerate violence (and I don't believe learning self-defense techniques qualifies as violence), yet she, who is a very public survivor of dating violence, so frequently employs violence and violent lyrics and imagery in her songs. (And I do consider the lyrics to her song "S&M" ... "Whips and chains excite me" ... to be violent.) I consider her song "Russian Roulette" to be an example of this. Yes, she is an artist, but to me it almost seems like she's got some unresolved issues as far as her dating past goes.
It is very likely that she has issues with violence but then, in this society, how many of us don't? I think though that we need to be careful to distinguish the kind of controlled, violent experience she sings about in S&M from actual intimate partner violence because they are 2 very different things. BDSM play relies on consent while IPV is about one person controlling another person who has absolutely no say in what's being done to them through violence .
Russian Roulette is also a different perspective in that she herself is the one who is committing a (metaphorical?) act of violence against herself as opposed to someone doing it to her.
Also, as the commenter mentioned earlier, she is ultimately an artist and therefore has chosen very provocative imagery for her work and I am betting she is well aware of the effects it has. I think "Man Down" is because it is shocking and disturbing and is making us talk about the issue of violence in our communities.
i totally hear you on the puzzling part GinaBoBina. i think part of this discussion is what you have mentioned: how are we defining violence? you mention you do not see self-defense as violence, so I wonder what you do consider to be violent. It's important to discuss what is defined and thus applied and labeled as violent, in my opinion. Because that there is power. Power to make and forge boundaries, label and identify such things and experiences.That is media making as well.
Your example of her S&M song is interesting as well. I think the difference here is the issue of CONSENT. in the song Rihanna is consenting to have those experiences and sensations, yet in your example above of self-defense, that person is being violent because they did NOT consent to certain things going on. See how defining and labeling is important? I think these are good examples to forge this conversation. Thanks for providing them. How do you see consent as connecting to power and violence in your examples?
I think her coping with "unresolved issues" in her dating life is something that everyone may experience who lives in a society where dating is the norm. Her healing is something that is personal and who are we to complain or critique how she best heals? yes, she may choose to do so in public, after all her dating life is in public as well. Perhaps this is her way to cope with many things in her life: celebrity, media, media making, family. etc.
Thanks, Media Justice, for saying that I had some points you agree with.
This is where I'm coming from as far as my definition of violence:
One, it's such a natural part of our psychology, the fight-or-flight instinct and self-preservation, that sometimes when we are backed into a corner, the claws come out and we attack the attacker like a honey badger. I have never been in a position where I was threatened physically or emotionally where I didn't fight back to prevent more harm to myself.
Two, just because someone enjoys the way something makes them feel doesn't mean it is good for them. I lump S&M and other "kinky" forms of sexual expression into this category because from what I understand people push the boundaries and it gradually gets more and more dangerous, similar to how a heroin addict develops a tolerance to the drug and has to keep upping the dose in order to get high and eventually may die of an overdose. The death of David Carradine from auto-erotic asphyxiation is a good example of this.
Three, there is consent in "Russian Roulette" and someone dies at the end of that song. Is that not violence?
I totally agree with your comments about our society's selective acceptance of violence. For instance, images of government employed authority figures commiting acts of violence are abundant in the media. We are no longer shocked by police shootings or coverage of military action, especially when men are involved. But when a female police officer is involved or a a female soldier is taken hostage, extra media coverage and public outcry are typical; as if women in these roles should somehow be shielded or more protected than their male counterparts.
This gender biased perspective is one part of a larger delusion- a denial that government and organized society in general exist mainly to suppress, control or direct the violence that exists within all of us.
One thing I will say about controlled violence in terms of martial arts/combat training: As you learn more, you have a tendency to become more cautious. I'm only a beginnner but with the things I have learned, I know I can inflict serious harm on another human being and that is not something I take lightly. The result is that I am not likely to ever misuse what I have learned or abuse others. This is something that I hear from many other practitioners of martial arts or even sports like boxing. Once you have an idea of what you are capable of, you are far more careful about how and why you use those skills. Maybe that's part of the problem. If you don't know how much damage you can inflict, you may be more likely to hurt others simply because you're clueless as to the real consequences.
i'm sure there are convos re: ethics, but there is not one i've heard about from a writing, singing, dancing perspective that discusses when such artists hurt others with their work and (mis)use? their power. it's very layered and complicated and i appareciate you sharing! xo
do you think they could have used someone who is any lighter than this one character and folks not project that it could be seen as chris brown? perhaps they made a concious effort to try to curb those attempts by choosing someone who is more of everything CB is not in this video so that we could suspend that part of our knowledge of her relationship and see this as a story telling, a testimony that may not be her personal one with CB, but one nonetheless. perhaps they wanted to avoid the "did CB rape rihanna" ish. and i totally get that.
perhaps they also wanted to hire local talent, regardless the issue remains. the fact remains. i think they also chose someone who is as muscular and athletic as this person to represent a certain type of masculinity and power as well. very crafted and constructed message and lots of different perspectives!
Russian Roulette is also a different perspective in that she herself is the one who is committing a (metaphorical?) act of violence against herself as opposed to someone doing it to her.
Also, as the commenter mentioned earlier, she is ultimately an artist and therefore has chosen very provocative imagery for her work and I am betting she is well aware of the effects it has. I think "Man Down" is because it is shocking and disturbing and is making us talk about the issue of violence in our communities.
Your example of her S&M song is interesting as well. I think the difference here is the issue of CONSENT. in the song Rihanna is consenting to have those experiences and sensations, yet in your example above of self-defense, that person is being violent because they did NOT consent to certain things going on. See how defining and labeling is important? I think these are good examples to forge this conversation. Thanks for providing them. How do you see consent as connecting to power and violence in your examples?
I think her coping with "unresolved issues" in her dating life is something that everyone may experience who lives in a society where dating is the norm. Her healing is something that is personal and who are we to complain or critique how she best heals? yes, she may choose to do so in public, after all her dating life is in public as well. Perhaps this is her way to cope with many things in her life: celebrity, media, media making, family. etc.
This is where I'm coming from as far as my definition of violence:
One, it's such a natural part of our psychology, the fight-or-flight instinct and self-preservation, that sometimes when we are backed into a corner, the claws come out and we attack the attacker like a honey badger. I have never been in a position where I was threatened physically or emotionally where I didn't fight back to prevent more harm to myself.
Two, just because someone enjoys the way something makes them feel doesn't mean it is good for them. I lump S&M and other "kinky" forms of sexual expression into this category because from what I understand people push the boundaries and it gradually gets more and more dangerous, similar to how a heroin addict develops a tolerance to the drug and has to keep upping the dose in order to get high and eventually may die of an overdose. The death of David Carradine from auto-erotic asphyxiation is a good example of this.
Three, there is consent in "Russian Roulette" and someone dies at the end of that song. Is that not violence?
This gender biased perspective is one part of a larger delusion- a denial that government and organized society in general exist mainly to suppress, control or direct the violence that exists within all of us.