by Bianca Laureano
One of the things I learned early on in college was that the philosophers, professors, and activists I looked up to and admired had a lot of their own flaws they were working out. As I’ve evolved into a sexologists of Color, one of the few I might add, the skill I’ve had to develop and nurture the most is: finesse. You see, there are many sexologists, sex educators, researchers and therapists in the US that have done amazing work and continue to do so, however often their work excludes poor people, people of Color, immigrants, people with disabilities, and youth.
I remember when I realized I had to take Betty Dodson to task for a video she uploaded about a trip to Cuba. She and her working partner Carlin had described the “big Black horny Cuban men” in a way that was demeaning, perpetuated the “fear” of the White female tourist, condescending, and oversexualized men of Color, especially LatiNegr@s. I’m sure neither of them saw or read that piece I wrote. And honestly, if they did they probably wouldn’t have to do anything about it. You see that’s because they have that privilege to identify people of Color in another country in such ways without having to consider any backlash. My small attempt at calling them out on their ethnocentrism, racism, classism, elitism, and being just plain triflin’, I see as one part of the reason why I came to this field. We deserve to be a part of the conversations about us and our sexuality.
There are not enough of us, people of Color, people from oppressed and marginalized communities speaking out and to the “foremothers” and “forefathers.” I remember being in a training and the White female trainer talking about how we can use the Kinsey scale to describe the behaviors of men who have sex with men (MSM). This trainer put adult MSM of Color at the same level as adolescents. I shared that from my perspective this was infantilizing adult men of Color, something that our society already does and that I’m not going to perpetuate that or what she suggested and use the scale in such a way. She was not prepared for me to challenge her in such an astute and intelligent way. Her response was that she “doesn’t think the scale was created for that intent.” Well duh, there were not many people of Color Kinsey even interviewed! After she came up to me and wanted to “make sure I was ok.” As if my speaking out and challenging what she said automatically made me someone who needed care of some sort, apparently questioning a White woman providing a training means you are not feeling well.
I share these with you because there was no one that shared them with me. When I attending the World Association of Sexology (now called World Association of Sexual Health) Congress in Cuba in 2003, it was my first time seeing sexologist and sex researchers disagree with one another in a way that was not only intelligent, but passionate, and right! We don’t really see that here in the US. It is such a binary here; you are for or against abortion, sexuality education, or birth control. Yet those are some complicated topics! Today, I’m going to deconstruct a piece of writing from a sex therapist I admire and respect very much, but whose latest article may have done more harm than anything else.
Dr. Marty Klein has been in the sexuality field for decades. I read his last book America’s War On Sex and really supported his ideas and writing on the topics. I’m also a big supporter of his approach and ideas about “sex addiction.” He gets it….usually.
When I went to visit his blog recently I found this article: “Speaking As Janet Jackson’s Nipple”and I almost lost my mind. My eyes almost rolled out of my head just by reading the title. When I finished reading the article I posted it on a few social media sites asking “can a White man speak from this perspective?” A handful of my friends and colleagues responded.
First to respond was my good friend Denise Rodriguez. Denise is considering becoming one of the handful of Chicana sexologists in the US, and she shared:
“I don't know how I feel about a White man talking as a Black woman's nipple. It bothers me.”
“I just read this. I was sort of with him for some of it, but he lost me with the "better lighting" comment at the end. Somehow, ending the essay by further objectifying Janet's body (he does it throughout, but this is the clearest example) seems inappropriate. I also don't like the idea of the bodies of women of color as public property to be commented on.”And that’s why Jerome is my jew! He gets it and isn’t afraid to let others know or call other White men on their stuff. Another sexologist of Color whom I adore is Mariotta Gary-Smith, a graduate of 2009 of the CESH Scholars Program. She shared with me her impression of the article by saying:
This is some hot mess. There may have been an intent to create discussion here. He may have wanted to point out some of the issues of the commercials that were run during halftime, but instead this whole post came off badly to me. Very self centered, and disrespectful...it didn't make me appreciate his perspective nor his intent because of his delivery. And the point of him wanting more light on JJ's nipple? That rubbed me wrong. And again, it's another (white) male comment on the body of a woman of color. So, he gets the DISLIKE from me.The question “can a White man speak from this perspective?” was my initial question. But after thinking about it a little more my answer would be yes, but in a very specific way. Here’s the deal: if you are willing and able to pull from the years of fear, hatred, mockery, abuse, and violence of Black women’s sexuality and include that in an analysis such as this, one that might be called an intersectional analysis, then yes, I think someone could speak from such a perspective. However, I don’t see that happening in this piece. I also don’t see an attempt to encourage women of Color to speak for themselves in this piece. Instead I see the objectification of a Black women’s body in the US continuing.