Act
In The Culture
Issues
Campaigns
Support
About
Advocates For Youth
Who was robbed at this year's Oscars?
Avatar for Best Picture
Gabby Sidibe
Up in the Air for Adapted Screenplay
Anna Kendrick for Supporting Actress
Fantastic Mr. Fox for Best Animation
Johnny Weir! Still bitter.

You must be logged in to vote.
You must be logged in to vote




My Sistahs - A webite by and for young women of color
Youth Resource - A website by and for lgbtq youth
Advocates for Youth - A website for parents, health professionals and educators
AmbienteJoven.org 
Blog - Amplify your voice

Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:28:00 PM EDT
Rating:

Last Thursday, at a licensing rules hearing for Nebraska psychologists, the topic of debate between the Nebraska Psychology Association and the Nebraska Catholic Conference was a  “convictions of conscience” rule that would allow psychologists (and possibly counselors, social workers, and marriage and family therapists) to “refuse to treat — and refuse to refer clients — because of religious or moral convictions.”

Of course, this reminds us of former President Bush’s last minute “provider conscience regulation,” which threatened a woman’s ability to obtain contraceptives such as birth control pills, make appointments to schedule an abortion, get information about birth control and other health care options, etc. based on the moral or religious conscience of the doctor, pharmacist, receptionist, etc. Thankfully, President Obama, soon after being sworn into office, acted to reverse this dangerous regulation.

Now though, Nebraska citizens are facing the possibility of being discriminated against by another unnecessary and harmful ruling.

This is where it seems to have started. During the hearing, Edward Stringham, a Lincoln psychologist, made a point of the 2001 federal court case in which…

 the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals supported an employer who fired a counselor for  refusing, on moral grounds, to provide relationship enhancement counseling to a  lesbian.

The Lincoln Journal Star reports that currently…

 While most ethics codes for professional counselors and psychologists allow  professionals to refuse to offer services based on ethical or moral convictions, the  codes generally require the professional to refer the client. 

James K. Cole, a representative for the Nebraska Psychology Association at the hearing,  says that allowing psychologists to not only refuse treatment but to refuse to refer the patient to another doctor is an unnecessary change to the ethics code that opens a “Pandora’s box” of discrimination.

 There have been no known problems nationally or in Nebraska with claims that  psychologists are forced to compromise moral or religious values because of the  national ethics code requiring them to help refer a client, he said.
 It could allow any provider to discriminate against virtually anyone —as long as  they claim a conflicting moral or religious belief.

As a forensic psychologist himself, Cole also said…

 “I have provided psychological services to individuals convicted of murder,  and…I have seen sexual offenders including individuals who are sexually  attracted to children and who have abused children without ever having to  compromise my moral belief that this behavior is wrong,”

But if this “convictions of conscience” rule is implemented, it effects more than murderers, rapists, and pedophiles. The list of traits, actions, lifestyles, beliefs, and personalities that this effects could be endless: gay, transgender, transsexual, gender non-conforming,  black, Arab, Jewish, atheist, a sexually active teen, a woman who’s had an abortion, etc. All of these people not only turned away, but not given the name of someone else who may be able to help them. Instead of hearing, “I’m sorry that I can’t help you, but please let me give you the name of someone who may be able to,” they would hear, “I can’t help you and I don’t care enough or respect you or your problems enough even to suggest someone who could.”

This kind of behavior in a licensed psychologist is rude, immoral, and goes against what they (should) stand for as psychologists. They are there to help people with their problems, whether personally or by recommending them to another psychologist. The Nebraska Catholic Conference, by supporting this change to the ethics code, is supporting discrimination of the people who likely need help the most. Getting this slap in the face from your psychologist when you’re already there because you have an issue you need counseling for is something that should make the Nebraska Catholic Conference ashamed of itself. As Catholics, shouldn’t they be interested in helping those who need it? Shouldn’t they welcome those who are different from themselves because all people are equal to God? If they’re going to call themselves Catholic, shouldn’t they act like it?

~Samantha

Comments
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
While in DC...
By tillyrose
0 comments

District of Columbia has the World's First Female Football Coach
By kirbygirl87
0 comments

Commodity for Sale
By justifiable
0 comments

Vatican Doesn't Believe in Safe Sex: Condom Machines "Trivalize Sexuality"
By kirbygirl87
0 comments

Sorry, No More Antiretroviral Drugs For You
By AFY_Durryle
0 comments

International Women Day in Ethiopia
By Mery
0 comments

The Celluloid Ceiling
By Culture_Voyeur
0 comments

What Do We Know About Open Relationships?
By Media_Justice
0 comments

Know your options. Respect them!
By Aye
0 comments

Naruto Shippuden!
By narutoandsoniclover
0 comments

A Step Backwards
By addiszemen
1 comments

Beijing +15
By pedlarm
1 comments

To abort? or not to abort? That is the question
By KarachiYWOCLC
2 comments

HIROSHIMA IMAGES-1 more to come.
By snorkamaiden
0 comments

Prom Cancelled Because a Girl Wanted to Bring Her Girlfriend
By RyAnYWOC
3 comments

My Love Letter to Feminism
By Jill
2 comments

Midwest Unite + Fight Conference is This Weekend
By Mahayana
0 comments

Utah: Prosecuting women is a “national model” for the anti-abortion movement
By AFY_Will
1 comments

Guest Post: The Fight for Sex Education in Utah
By Amplify_Staff
0 comments

24% of Young Adults Think 2 Condoms is Better!
By kirbygirl87
1 comments

Dentyne Ice Compares Gum to Condoms
By kirbygirl87
3 comments

Although there were bumps in the road, my distribution begins on Tuesday.
By YeseniaSuliveres
2 comments

Reflections on International Women’s Day: It’s Time to Get Current, Get Respect, and Get Inclusive
By Nicole
1 comments

Ad Tells Women: "Abortion Changes Things..."
By kirbygirl87
3 comments

Girl Child Education in Nigeria; Why Not?
By kiki
1 comments