LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES

Website Blog
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Videos
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

by:  Leah627
Friday, January 9, 2009 at 12:15:00 PM EST

Eugene, Oregon, my home for the past seventeen years, is known for its Track and Field history, its population of aging hippies, and its gem, the University of Oregon. So I couldn’t hide my surprise when my brother told me that Girls Gone Wild was coming to Taboo, Eugene’s downtown nightclub.

Girls Gone Wild epitomizes objectification. It promotes sex as a commodity, takes women's bodies for granted, and degrades, dehumanizes, and disrespects girls my age. I could go on a rant expressing my disdain, disgust, and frustration with Girls Gone Wild. Instead, I let my friends do it. I sent out a text message asking girls and boys, gay and straight, “If you had to describe your impression of Girls Gone Wild in one word, what would it be?

As I expected, responses started flowing in immediately: the presence of the Girls Gone Wild van parked downtown had much of South Eugene High School riled up (whether in excitement, bewilderment, or displeasure). Here are some of my friends’ and classmates’ responses:

Desperate. A disgrace. Inappropriate. Revolting. Wrong. Annoying. Experienced. Insecure. Adolescent. Skanky. Slutty. Degrading. Trashy. Out of control. Sick. Drunk. Naked. Ridiculous. Exploitation. Sad. Pathetic. Regret. Gross. Depressing. Scandalous. Outrageous. Foolish. Dehumanizing. Cheap. Embarrassing. Absurd.

The amount of responses I received dubbing GGW as “slutty,” “sluts,” or “skanky” does bother me-- but that's fodder for another blog.(Actually, check out this recent Amplify post!)

The responses that I found the most intriguing were those that delved a little bit deeper.  Yes, they exceeded my one-word limit, but I cut my friends some slack.

One friend of mine, a budding entrepreneur, first classified GGW as "ambitious." I asked him to explain. He wrote, "The owner...forgot his name.  Worth alot alot of money. Maybe change the word to enterprising."  True, I suppose.

Another classmate chose the word "empowering."  I didn't agree, but I wanted to hear more. He explained, "It makes girls feel special and pretty and in turn raises their self-confidence and then they live happier lives.  So it's empowering."  

Oh boy, where to start.  Yes, being photographed sans shirt may feel momentarily empowering for young women as they drunkenly accept free Girls Gone Wild merchandise.  But will they feel empowered the next day?  Will they feel empowered in ten years when a prospective employer finds the footage online?  Will they feel empowered in fifteen years when their son checks out old GGW tapes and sees his mom wildly flashing the camera?

Some argue that prostitution should be legalized, and that choosing a career in the sex industry can be a form of empowerment.  The sex industry can be more lucrative than many low-wage jobs, and who is to say that women can’t make decisions about their employment for themselves?  I see the legitimacy of this argument, but Girls Gone Wild cannot fit into this category.  Women who work in the sex industry do just that.  They work.  Women who volunteer to flash their breasts on GGW do not receive full name recognition or a wage of any sort.  Yes, they are giving enthusiastic consent, but behind their consent often lays exploitation and cunning that goes hand in hand with GGW’s mass marketing efforts. 

Ironically, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon hosted a sexual health awareness party at Taboo Nightclub just two months ago, featuring free resources, condoms, games, and information.  Sadly, Girls Gone Wild drew a larger crowd than the Planned Parenthood event.

However, there is hope: friends of mine who attended Eugene GGW event reported that whooping, cell-phone camera-wielding men far outnumbered women that night.  Sick?  Yes.  But at least this might indicate that women are valuing their self-worth and dignity higher than GGW producers expect.

But these same friends also told me about one overweight woman who approached the videographers.  Upon lifting up her shirt, the men in the crowd booed her away.  There is obviously work to be done.

One of my friends texted me saying, “I want more respect than that.”  Until men stop treating women and their bodies as commodities and give women their full respect, the Girls Gone Wild van will continue to make its way across the country in search of “The Hottest Girl in America.”  I know one thing for sure: this “Hot Girl” won’t give in to exploitation by taking her shirt off for GGW this year.  

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
Wow, what a proud day for the guys crowded around with the cellphone cams, right?

 Thanks for this post.  I'd also like to point out the role of liquor in women's participation in GGW: I notice it doesn't take place at the shopping mall!
# Posted By  AFY_EmilyB | 1/9/09 03:38 PM | Reply
 Great post!  Are breasts really that irresistible  that guys have to see them in this venue?  Grow up!
# Posted By lzreis | 1/9/09 03:59 PM | Reply
Being that I am a teenager who is surprisingly out of the loop in terms of media, I had only heard of "Girls Gone Wild" in passing. I didn't really know what it was. So when I recieved your text message I responded that I had never seen it. When I went online and searched wikipedia I was disgusted. Your blog entry is far more empowering than GGW will ever be; kudos to you. 

# Posted By readyforpeace | 1/9/09 05:16 PM | Reply
 I think it's really important to focus on the institutions (ie. Girl's Gone Wild) and systems (ie. patriarchy) that perpetuate INjustice.  I don't think we move forward at all by attacking the individual women who participate - whether consentially, coerced, after drinking heavily, etc.  Throwing around the word slut in this case makes me wonder what values are being upheld and what values are being undermined.  

It's a complicated issue - thanks for starting the dialogue.
# Posted By  love-and-organizing | 1/10/09 07:36 PM | Reply
 I appreciate your blog. I am conflicted about GGW and i appreciate one the person above me commented about the institution being formed from patriarchy. I think GGW is an institution that takes advantages of you women by objectifying them and diminishing women to just their parts. Which in sense just continues the devaluization of women  in today's society. But I don't think there is anything wrong with nudity or sexuality and in no way should GGW be labeled as slutty (and the word slut starts its own just as complicated dialogue). There are many other institutions that show women in the nude or women doing something sexual that I would not condemn. I'm still doing research but Suicide Girls posts photographs of alternative looking girls in the nude or in not very many clothes, and it is done much more tastefully and artfully and done with the intent of appreciating the beauty of the female body, feeling empowered in your sexual and proud of your body. And all of the girls who do it do it consensually and feel pretty proud and empowered by the photos they've taken. 
# Posted By  ekimx425 | 1/13/09 03:03 PM | Reply
Side note: I would suggest looking further into Suicide Girls and the level of empowerment for the women involved. Though I think that the site does have models that are likely to be empowered by their work, I personally know several people who used to model for them and did not have that experience. If you find something interesting, let us know!
# Posted By  MidwestGenderQueer | 1/16/09 05:26 PM | Reply
I am intensely fascinated with this genre of pornography, which for lack of a better term I just label as "Questionable-Consent Porn." There are scores of branches of porn all involving people who are at diminished levels of consent because of alcohol, drugs, sleep, or a physical or mental incapability. I haven't gotten far on my research on it, but maybe in the future we will know more on where the drive for this comes from.
If I were to hypothesize, I would say that it is mainly excitement driven, perhaps coupled with a partner-interest complex. The GGW videos are all of women screaming and giggling, more than happy to display themselves in any number of sexual ways. That excites people because those interested want a consenting partner who is willing to "give it all" with no inhibitions. This might be a replacement for a desire for emotional or physical "passion." On the other side of things, there are also a great many forms of porn that focus on the opposite end of partner-interest, which has more of a sadomasochistic basis.
Dude, this is a really sexologist-y post. Lol, sorry about that, think I got a little carried away.

# Posted By  MidwestGenderQueer | 1/16/09 05:35 PM | Reply
Yes, being photographed sans shirt may feel momentarily empowering for young women as they drunkenly accept free Girls Gone Wild merchandise.  But will they feel empowered the next day?  Will they feel empowered in ten years when a prospective employer finds the footage online?  Will they feel empowered in fifteen years when their son checks out old GGW tapes and sees his mom wildly flashing the camera?
So essentially you're saying women should feel ashamed of themselves because of the choices they make. And why? Because men with money and little kids might see them.

Let alone the fact that the odds of an employer finding nude pictures of a Playboy model is slim to none. Girls Gone Wild is even more slim. By the time a kid is interested in looking at porn, GGW will be old, old news.
# Posted By BradODonnell | 1/17/09 02:58 PM | Reply