LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES

Website Blog
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Videos
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

by: Jill
Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 12:25:00 AM EST

So I'm sure most of you know by now that many of the Men's Rights blogs out there are FREAKING OUT right now because several organizations, like MADRE, have made a commitment to focusing their aid efforts in Haiti on women and children. If you're not familiar I'll let the blogger at The Spearhead explain his take on this situation:

However, some relief groups have decided that women deserve more aid, and have come up with a number of reasons why men should be left to die from injuries and disease while women get preferential treatment.

[...]

It is not clear whether such discrimination in the wake of disaster is legal in Haiti. In any event, if men are needlessly dying because these women’s groups are hoarding supplies for women only, the Haitian government should send troops in to seize the supplies and distribute them equally to needy men and women alike. That would be a true act of mercy.
This may seem like a valid, if blown out of proportion, argument at first glance. However, there are a few reasons why I am incredibly reluctant to give creedence to the people complaining about MADRE and like organizations.The first reason, the "humane" and "compassionate" comments that the readers of this blog leave. For example:
          "I hope their plane crashes on the way to Haiti."

Better still, I hope it gets blown off course and makes a crash landing on a castaway island somewhere, the women-only crew/passengers all survive, they have to get by as best they can for a year with no men around, and at least one of them records what happens (because I wouldn’t be counting on any of them to still be alive to tell the tale).
Misandry is a bubble. Bubbles always pop.

I am waiting for a time when women are paid a cash bonus for aborting a male fetus. This, of course, will distort the gender ratio and make such a civilization ripe for replacement.
There is no law in Haiti beyond the flickering lights of a few UN/InternationalAid Camps. Machete wielding gangs are the real arbitrator of who gets what everywhere else.

Stupid feminists. When they go there and announce that their aid is for women only, they will be unceremoniously chopped up and dismembered. Unless, of course, they can induce some American guys to help them deliberately starve Haitian guys. But that can only work in the very few places where any kind of Law prevails.
I don't care how much of a jerk someone is, I would never wish for their plane to crash, or even worse for their dismemberment and yet these were the common sentiments on this blog. This is how I made my first assesment: these people are clearly not coming from a good place, a place that values all human life.

The second assesment took a little more digging but, still, I very quickly managed to confirm that, on top of being jerks, these bloggers were also very ignorant. The blog post attempts to act as a call for equality, however, traditional aid that ignores gender completley is rarely equal. Why? Well, lets look at the facts:
  1. Women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men during natural disasters.
  2. "Women have less access to resources – social networks and influence, transportation, information, skills (including literacy), control over land and other economic resources, personal mobility, secure housing and employment, freedom from violence and control over decision-making - that are essential in disaster preparedness, mitigation and rehabilitation."
  3. "Women are [...] overrepresented in the agriculture industry, self-employment and the informal economy, in under-paid jobs with little security and no benefits such as healthcare or union representation. The informal and agricultural sectors are usually the most impacted by natural disasters, thus women become over-represented among the unemployed following a disaster."
  4. "Because housing is often destroyed in the disaster, many families are forced to relocate to shelters. Inadequate facilities for simple daily tasks such as cooking means that women’s domestic burden increases at the same time as her economic burden, leaving her less freedom and mobility to look for alternative sources of income."
  5. "Disasters themselves can serve to increase women’s vulnerability. Aside from the increase in female-headed households and the fact that the majority of shelter residents are women, numerous studies have shown an increase in levels of domestic and sexual violence following disasters. "
  6. "As one of the primary aspects of women’s health in particular, reproductive and sexual health are beginning to be recognized as key components of disaster relief efforts, however attention to them remains inadequate and women’s health suffers disproportionately as a result."
(All but the first fact via GenSalud)

The point? When the MRAs making this complaint see EXTRA aid being given to women, they are neglecting the bigger picture - a picture that shows the huge disadvantage women start out with when dealing with a natural disaster. When that disadvantage is taken into account "extra" aid looks a lot less like a "bonus prize" that callously ignores men and much more like an effort to even the playing field and give women just as much a chance to survive as men. Equality, not callously exterminating men... thats what feminism is all about!

If you plan to donate, please consider contributing to MADRE or the Gender and Disaster Network in their efforts to help foster equality, even in a time of crisis. Or just donate to any Haiti-focused charity but, please, do something. If you know of any other awesome organizations please let us know in the comments!

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments
Thanks for writing about this, Jill!
# Posted By Mahayana | 1/17/10 10:44 PM | Report | Reply
Thanks Jill for your plot and I agree with you wholeheartedly. That is one frustration that I sometimes have with the Men's Rights movement in that sometimes they come off as really not getting some crucial dynamics of gender inequality. If women and children had started off on equal footing in terms of access to resources before this disaster that would be one thing, but the fact that they did not I think obliterates most of the points the MRA blogger was making. Lastly and crucially, I highly doubt that alot of these organizations would turn away the men that would seek their help. Making sure women and children are prioritized is important strategically and has many practical implications especially since study after study has demonstrated the importance of investing in women for improving their health and their families health and education which leads to gains in development and capacity building.

Also I donated to UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) if other people are looking for another organization to donate to besides MADRE. According to their website:
In addition to needing food, water, shelter and medical care, women have particular needs that must be addressed during disaster and post-conflict situations. These include emergency obstetric care, hygiene supplies and mechanisms for aid distribution that prevent exploitation.Thank you for joining us in this work.

# Posted By  vanessaaishacoleman | 1/18/10 12:28 PM | Report | Reply
Thanks for the great post, Jill!

While your piece focuses on promoting equality in urgent *relief* situations, your argument also reminded me of the comprehensive argument in favor of women's development programs that Nick Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn present in "Half the Sky." The need for such programs rests on our moral obligation to combat systemic inequality. In addition, though, it's simply in individual countries and the international community's self-interest to promote such programs. In large part, institutions like the Grameen Bank owe their success to the ingenuity of women entrepreneurs...ultimately, it's illogical to see such game-changers as "biased" against men, since the practical dividends generated are almost always enjoyed by both men and women -- i.e., by society as a whole.
# Posted By AFY_Nikki | 1/18/10 08:07 PM | Report | Reply
Women in developing countries are usually the most affected by natural disasters because they are likely to be in the home as opposed to outside.  And, as in the case of the tsunami, women were less likely to know how to swim and this, coupled with the fact that they were likely to be in the home, led to many more women being killed.  Women are also usually caring for small children and more likely to be poor than men, even in the poorest of places.  Finally, research shows that women are more likely than men to spend their money on their families' health, nutrition and education.
# Posted By zeldica | 1/19/10 01:41 PM | Report | Reply
Thanks for the great post.  You have a very valid argument, definitely more so than "I hope their plane crashes."  Have you commented on their blog?  I would definitely recommend doing so.  Of course, I tend to just get upset when arguing with people like that, because their responses would probably be something along the lines of "Shut up, stupid feminist.  Quit being such an angry lesbian!" or spewing other offensive myths about feminists and women and general...  The "stupid feminists" comment was particularly aggravating.  Obviously, as was shown by your research, there is still an equality issue in the world.  Why are they so afraid of admitting that?  Instead, they resort to an ad homenim attack... grr.  Anyway, continue your great work! 
# Posted By cmartin626 | 1/20/10 03:01 PM | Report | Reply