Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 12:25:00 AM EST
So I'm sure most of you know by now that many of the Men's Rights blogs out there are FREAKING OUT right now because several organizations, like MADRE, have made a commitment to focusing their aid efforts in Haiti on women and children. If you're not familiar I'll let the blogger at The Spearhead explain his take on this situation:
However, some relief groups have decided that women deserve more aid, and have come up with a number of reasons why men should be left to die from injuries and disease while women get preferential treatment.
[...]
It is not clear whether such discrimination in the wake of disaster is legal in Haiti. In any event, if men are needlessly dying because these women’s groups are hoarding supplies for women only, the Haitian government should send troops in to seize the supplies and distribute them equally to needy men and women alike. That would be a true act of mercy.
This may seem like a valid, if blown out of proportion, argument at first glance. However, there are a few reasons why I am incredibly reluctant to give creedence to the people complaining about MADRE and like organizations.
The first reason, the "humane" and "compassionate" comments that the readers of this blog leave. For example:
"I hope their plane crashes on the way to Haiti."
Better still, I hope it gets blown off course and makes a crash landing on a castaway island somewhere, the women-only crew/passengers all survive, they have to get by as best they can for a year with no men around, and at least one of them records what happens (because I wouldn’t be counting on any of them to still be alive to tell the tale).
Misandry is a bubble. Bubbles always pop.
I am waiting for a time when women are paid a cash bonus for aborting a male fetus. This, of course, will distort the gender ratio and make such a civilization ripe for replacement.
There is no law in Haiti beyond the flickering lights of a few UN/InternationalAid Camps. Machete wielding gangs are the real arbitrator of who gets what everywhere else.
Stupid feminists. When they go there and announce that their aid is for women only, they will be unceremoniously chopped up and dismembered. Unless, of course, they can induce some American guys to help them deliberately starve Haitian guys. But that can only work in the very few places where any kind of Law prevails.
I don't care how much of a jerk someone is, I would never wish for their plane to crash, or even worse for their dismemberment and yet these were the common sentiments on this blog. This is how I made my first assesment: these people are clearly not coming from a good place, a place that values all human life.
The second assesment took a little more digging but, still, I very quickly managed to confirm that, on top of being jerks, these bloggers were also very ignorant. The blog post attempts to act as a call for equality, however, traditional aid that ignores gender completley is rarely equal. Why? Well, lets look at the facts:
- Women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men during natural disasters.
- "Women have less access to resources – social networks and influence, transportation, information, skills (including literacy), control over land and other economic resources, personal mobility, secure housing and employment, freedom from violence and control over decision-making - that are essential in disaster preparedness, mitigation and rehabilitation."
- "Women are [...] overrepresented in the agriculture industry, self-employment and the informal economy, in under-paid jobs with little security and no benefits such as healthcare or union representation. The informal and agricultural sectors are usually the most impacted by natural disasters, thus women become over-represented among the unemployed following a disaster."
- "Because housing is often destroyed in the disaster, many families are forced to relocate to shelters. Inadequate facilities for simple daily tasks such as cooking means that women’s domestic burden increases at the same time as her economic burden, leaving her less freedom and mobility to look for alternative sources of income."
- "Disasters themselves can serve to increase women’s vulnerability. Aside from the increase in female-headed households and the fact that the majority of shelter residents are women, numerous studies have shown an increase in levels of domestic and sexual violence following disasters. "
- "As one of the primary aspects of women’s health in particular, reproductive and sexual health are beginning to be recognized as key components of disaster relief efforts, however attention to them remains inadequate and women’s health suffers disproportionately as a result."
(All but the first fact via
GenSalud)
The point? When the MRAs making this complaint see EXTRA aid being given to women, they are neglecting the bigger picture - a picture that shows the huge disadvantage women start out with when dealing with a natural disaster. When that disadvantage is taken into account "extra" aid looks a lot less like a "bonus prize" that callously ignores men and much more like an effort to even the playing field and give women just as much a chance to survive as men. Equality, not callously exterminating men... thats what feminism is all about!
If you plan to donate, please consider contributing to MADRE or the Gender and Disaster Network in their efforts to help foster equality, even in a time of crisis. Or just donate to any Haiti-focused charity but, please, do something. If you know of any other awesome organizations please let us know in the comments!
Also I donated to UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) if other people are looking for another organization to donate to besides MADRE. According to their website:
While your piece focuses on promoting equality in urgent *relief* situations, your argument also reminded me of the comprehensive argument in favor of women's development programs that Nick Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn present in "Half the Sky." The need for such programs rests on our moral obligation to combat systemic inequality. In addition, though, it's simply in individual countries and the international community's self-interest to promote such programs. In large part, institutions like the Grameen Bank owe their success to the ingenuity of women entrepreneurs...ultimately, it's illogical to see such game-changers as "biased" against men, since the practical dividends generated are almost always enjoyed by both men and women -- i.e., by society as a whole.