No one is perfect, that's a reality we all have to face and yet, in my feminism, I often find myself struggling to explain my every choice, every action, with the "right" reasoning... it can get exhausting. I wrote this post as an attempt to cleanse myself from this need - to analyze something that is both personal and political (in this case, my weight) in a way that acknowledges my imperfections. My motivations may not always be completely selfless, enlightened, or even right but they are mine and I will own them regardless.
On the scale of size privilege I rank pretty far towards the top, but that does not mean I haven't faced challenges. To be specific: years of body-hate, diet attempts that got obsessive all too fast, and the comments from family members (who always have my best interests at heart) concerning their concerns about my health. Furthermore, a fabulous blog I have been reading lately called Junkfood Science has been opening me quickly up to the idea that a little extra weight may actually have health benefits rather than the detriments I am always being warned about. If you have a little extra time I really reccomend reading the Obesity Paradox series of articles that Junkfood's writer Sandy Szwarc has put out. They dispel a lot of common weight-health myths that I was honestly shocked to find were not true. For example:1. The person who dreamed up the BMI said explicitly that it could not and should not be used to indicate the level of fatness in an individual.
2. It is scientifically nonsensical.
3. It is physiologically wrong.
It makes no allowance for the relative proportions of bone, muscle and fat in the body. But bone is denser than muscle and twice as dense as fat, so a person with strong bones, good muscle tone and low fat will have a high BMI. Thus, athletes and fit, health-conscious movie stars who work out a lot tend to find themselves classified as overweight or even obese.
4. It gets the logic wrong.
The CDC says on its Web site that "the BMI is a reliable indicator of body fatness for people." This is a fundamental error of logic. [...] If a person is fat or obese, he or she will have a high BMI [but] it doesn't work the other way round. A high BMI does not mean an individual is even overweight, let alone obese. It could mean the person is fit and healthy, with very little fat.
5. It's bad statistics.
6. It is lying by scientific authority.
7. It suggests there are distinct categories of underweight, ideal, overweight and obese, with sharp boundaries that hinge on a decimal place.
8. It makes the more cynical members of society suspect that the medical insurance industry lobbies for the continued use of the BMI to keep their profits high.
Insurance companies sometimes charge higher premiums for people with a high BMI. Among such people are all those fit individuals with good bone and muscle and little fat, who will live long, healthy lives during which they will have to pay those greater premiums.
9. Continued reliance on the BMI means doctors don't feel the need to use one of the more scientifically sound methods that are available to measure obesity levels.
Those alternatives cost a little bit more, but they give far more reliable results.
10. It embarrasses the U.S.
It is embarrassing for one of the most scientifically, technologically and medicinally advanced nations in the world to base advice on how to prevent one of the leading causes of poor health and premature death (obesity) on a 200-year-old numerical hack developed by a mathematician who was not even an expert in what little was known about the human body back then.
[Read the full explanations for each reason here!]
Putting physical health aside for a moment, there's also an emotional factor to weight at least for me.) I've been trying for awhile now to figure out exactly why the well meaning urges from my family to "get into shape" upset me so deeply. I am an argumentative person I suppose - I don't often get personally offended by opposing viewpoints, rather, I try to view them as a chance for education, for both parties, and I make my side known as best I can. With my weight, however, its different.
I completely agree with you: if you feel healthy and like your body, why change it?
I just started a "fitness camp" that I really like: we do circuit training for an hour every morning, and everyone goes at her own pace. That said, we did body measurements and a BMI/body fat percent calculation on the first day that made me feel really uncomfortable. For me, the goal of eating well and nutritiously and incorporating exercise in my life is to feel healthy and be happy, not how many inches or pounds I can shed. I work out because it makes me feel good, I eat healthily because good food propels me through the day, and when I want a big piece of cake, I eat it.
I hope you send this column to your family members who suggest that you lose weight-- maybe they'll finally understand where you're coming from. It will probably make them happy-- you exude confidence.
Thank you so much for sharing with us.
I just wanted to address something you said, "I just don't want to. I eat well, I exercise, and while I may not be in marathon-shape I can hold my own on the treadmill or in the fitness classes my college offers." What caught my eye about this particular line is your reference to "marathon shape". As a runner myself and a marathoner, I am here to tell you that there isn't even a "marathon shape" anymore.
I ran cross country and track in high school. I always thought I was fat because I was one of the average sized girls. However, how was I to know any differently? I was surrounded by girls who wore 0's and 2's, so I thought to myself, "THAT must be what a runner looks like". I just assumed I was a freak, who wore a size 8, who just happened to love running and I just didn't have the typical "runner's body". I didn't understand why my lucky teammates got to sport teeny singlets and split shorts every day, while I felt that I had to be stuck in my oversized t-shirt and baggy soccer shorts.
It wasn't until I graduated from high school and started training and running in marathons on my own that I realized that I was no freak. Runners come in all shapes and sizes. Old, young, fat, skinny, chubby, average, thin, muscular -- you name it, they were out there every morning on the Lakefront, training just like I was. For four years, I believed I didn't really belong to this community that I so wanted to be a part of because I weighed in at 140 and stood on my tip toes at 5 foot 6...and now, I feel I am an integral part of it.
In my many races, including marathons, I was passed by people who weighed more than me, and I beat people who weighed less than me. I was passed by people who weighed less than me, and I beat people who weighed more than me. It really doesn't matter. Because there is no longer a typical runner's body, because it comes in all different shapes. So, now, at age 21 I can finally confidently wear my singlet and split shorts on my daily afternoon runs because out on the road, it isn't really about what "they" (whoever they are) think at all, it is about me. With no makeup, no status, and no BS, running purifies me as a human being. And gosh darnit, my body is a fine-tuned, well-oiled machine.
Bravo, Jill.