LOG IN   JOIN   BLOG SEARCH   ALL DIARIES

Website Blog
Blog
Issues
Take Action
Videos
Donate
About
Youth Resources
My Sistahs
Advocates For Youth
 
Blog - Amplify your voice

Monday, March 28, 2011 at 3:08:00 PM EDT

One year ago, on March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This law made a major difference in young people's ability to access reproductive health care.

What it did: Guaranteed that preventive care, including lifesaving screenings for breast and cervical cancer, is available at no cost.

What it didn't do: Guarantee that birth control is included in the definition of "preventive care" and is available at no cost.

Birth control is key to preventive care! Sign the petition today and show your support for No-Cost Birth Control.

More than half of women aged 18 - 34 say that the cost of prescription birth control has made it hard for them to use birth control consistently. Removing the economic barrier to birth control would have a major impact on young people's lives.

Together, we have the power to help! Sign the petition and add your voice to the thousands of others who say:

Yes! I support no-cost birth control! The new health care reform law should make prescription birth control available without co-pays or other out-of-pocket costs to ensure that every woman has access to the birth control that works best for her. Reducing the number of unintended pregnancies and keeping women and children healthy are goals we all share.
Click here to sign the petition now!

But don't stop there: Be sure to pass this email along to your friends and family members. The cost of birth control should not stand in the way of people taking care of their health and lives.

If you are interested in gathering petitions at your school, in your office, or in your community, you can download the petition and find submission instructions here.

Share this entry:  del.icio.us | Facebook |  MySpace | Digg It! | Tweet This
Comments

Is birth control a preventitive measure at the same level as screenings for breast or cervical cancer?  Isn't making birth control free like making taxi rides for people who have had too much to drink free so that they don't drive home drunk?  People who get breast or cervical cancer aren't choosing to do activities that are putting them at greater risk for those cancers.  People choose to have sex, which puts them at risk for STIs and pregnancy.  You don't have to have sex.  Isn't the true preventitive measure in this instance education?  Comprehensive sexuality education would be more useful and empowering, I think.  Maybe I am wrong.  We aren't just animals, though.  We can think and choose.

# Posted By MakingYouThink | 4/5/11 10:40 AM | Reply
 To be clear, are you suggesting that all people remain abstinent for their whole lives? I assume there's an exception for having children. And what about same-sex couples? 
# Posted By AFY_Samantha | 4/6/11 12:02 AM | Reply
No one is saying that people should be abstinence their whole lives. The point is that risky behavior has consequences, and we have a choice whether or not to engage in said risky behaviors. The people who do not partake of the risky behaviors usually do not have to deal with STIs or unwanted pregnancy or the emotional aftermath. 

I'm proud to say I exhibit control over my destiny by understanding that while many things may feel good, they are not necessarily good for me. 

# Posted By GinaBoBina | 4/6/11 02:34 AM | Reply
 So are you saying that people who can't afford contraceptives or condoms should abstain from sex? Though there are reasons to abstain from sex, inability to afford safe sex shouldn't be one of them. And safe sex shouldn't be a privilege reserved for the middle class-and-above.
# Posted By RemyO | 4/20/11 12:51 PM | Reply